Talk:Exhaustion of intellectual property rights

Latest comment: 9 years ago by PraeceptorIP in topic Clugston article

Clugston article

edit

The main thesis of the Clugston article may be damaged by the recent Supreme Court decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. That may require some drastic edits. PraeceptorIP (talk) 00:59, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is supposed to be a general Wikipedia article about the exhaustion of intellectual property rights, without being focused on U.S. law. The Clugston article is in fact only used to support rather general considerations. --Edcolins (talk) 20:20, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
I think you are right. It is more than enough just to cite Kirtsaeng in a footnote and let it go at that. PraeceptorIP (talk) 21:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Reply