Wikipedia

Talk:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed/Reference Analysis

< Talk:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
Learn more about this page
      Self-claims and promotional references
      Claimed to be a self-published source
      Original research
      coat (tangent)
      Miscellaneous
  1. ^ a b c d e f g Dean, Cordelia. "Scientists Feel Miscast in Film on Life’s Origin", The New York Times, September 27, 2007. Retrieved on 2007-09-28.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Lesley Burbridge-Bates (2007-08-22). Expelled Press Release. Premise Media. Retrieved on 2007-09-29.
  3. ^ "99.9 percent of scientists accept evolution" Finding the Evolution in Medicine National Institutes of Health
  4. ^ Kitzmiller v. Dover page 82-3
  5. ^ a b See: 1) List of scientific societies rejecting intelligent design 2) Kitzmiller v. Dover page 83. 3) The Discovery Institute's A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism petition begun in 2001 has been signed by "over 700 scientists" as of August 20, 2006. A four day A Scientific Support for Darwinism petition gained 7733 signatories from scientists opposing ID. The AAAS, the largest association of scientists in the U.S., has 120,000 members, and firmly rejects ID. More than 70,000 Australian scientists and educators condemn teaching of intelligent design in school science classes. List of statements from scientific professional organizations on the status intelligent design and other forms of creationism. According to the New York Times "There is no credible scientific challenge to the theory of evolution as an explanation for the complexity and diversity of life on earth." Dean, Cordelia. "Scientists Feel Miscast in Film on Life’s Origin", The New York Times, September 27, 2007. Retrieved on 2007-09-28.
  6. ^ a b Teachernet, Document bank. Creationism teaching guidance. UK Department for Children, Schools and Families (September 18, 2007). Retrieved on 2007-10-01. “The intelligent design movement claims there are aspects of the natural world that are so intricate and fit for purpose that they cannot have evolved but must have been created by an 'intelligent designer'. Furthermore they assert that this claim is scientifically testable and should therefore be taught in science lessons. Intelligent design lies wholly outside of science. Sometimes examples are quoted that are said to require an 'intelligent designer'. However, many of these have subsequently been shown to have a scientific explanation, for example, the immune system and blood clotting mechanisms.

Attempts to establish an idea of the 'specified complexity' needed for intelligent design are surrounded by complex mathematics. Despite this, the idea seems to be essentially a modern version of the old idea of the "God-of-the-gaps". Lack of a satisfactory scientific explanation of some phenomena (a 'gap' in scientific knowledge) is claimed to be evidence of an intelligent designer.”

  1. ^ "for most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a creationist pseudoscience." Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design, David Mu, Harvard Science Review, Volume 19, Issue 1, Fall 2005.

• "Creationists are repackaging their message as the pseudoscience of intelligent design theory." Professional Ethics Report, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2001. • Conclusion of Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District Ruling

  1. ^ Wise, D.U., 2001, Creationism's Propaganda Assault on Deep Time and Evolution, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 49, n. 1, p. 30-35.
  2. ^ Who Believes What? Clearing up Confusion over Intelligent Design and Young-Earth Creationism, Marcus R. Ross, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 53, n. 3, May, 2005, p. 319-323
  3. ^ The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design, Expanded Edition, Ronald L. Numbers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, November 30, 2006, ISBN 0674023390.
  4. ^ Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005), Conclusion of Ruling.
  5. ^ a b Ruling, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, page 64
  6. ^ Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005), Conclusion of Ruling.
  7. ^ a b c d e Science Sunday: Intelligent Design Goes to the Movies, Dan Whipple, ColoradoConfidential, Dec 16, 2007
  8. ^ Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. ChristianCinema.com (2007-09-23). Retrieved on 2007-09-29.
  9. ^ In the News - Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. ARN (2007-09-24). Retrieved on 2007-09-29.
  10. ^ a b Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed the new film on the ID controversy. ID the future (2007-09-22). Retrieved on 2007-09-29.
  11. ^ a b Robert Crowther (October 24, 2007). Evolution News & Views: Intelligent Design is Not Creationism (No Matter What Bill O'Reilly Thinks). Discovery Institute. Retrieved on 2007-12-16.
  12. ^ "99.9 percent of scientists accept evolution" Finding the Evolution in Medicine National Institutes of Health
  13. ^ Kitzmiller v. Dover page 82-3
  14. ^ "for most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a creationist pseudoscience." Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design, David Mu, Harvard Science Review, Volume 19, Issue 1, Fall 2005.

• "Creationists are repackaging their message as the pseudoscience of intelligent design theory." Professional Ethics Report, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2001. • Conclusion of Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District Ruling

  1. ^ Wise, D.U., 2001, Creationism's Propaganda Assault on Deep Time and Evolution, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 49, n. 1, p. 30-35.
  2. ^ Who Believes What? Clearing up Confusion over Intelligent Design and Young-Earth Creationism, Marcus R. Ross, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 53, n. 3, May, 2005, p. 319-323
  3. ^ The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design, Expanded Edition, Ronald L. Numbers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, November 30, 2006, ISBN 0674023390.
  4. ^ Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005), Conclusion of Ruling.
  5. ^ a b Expelled Movie trailers
  6. ^ Ben Stein to battle `anti-religious dogmatism`, Bill Berkowitz, Top Scoops, Scoop Independent News, 11 September 2007.
  7. ^ New book by Discovery Institute Fellow shows influence of Darwinian principles on Hitler's Nazi regime, Discovery Institute.
  8. ^ Kent Hovind. The Dangers of Evolution [DVD]. USA: Creation Science Evangelism.
  9. ^ This creationist claim that is part of a Discovery Institute campaign (New book by Discovery Institute Fellow shows influence of Darwinian principles on Hitler's Nazi regime, Discovery Institute) and is repeated over and over in creationist literature. For example:

Darwinism and the Nazi race Holocaust, Jerry Bergman, CEN Technical Journal, 13(2):101–111, 1999. The Holocaust and evolution, Jonathan Sarfati, Creation 22(1):4, December 1999. Darwin's Deadly Legacy: The Chilling Impact of Darwin's Theory of Evolution, D. James Kennedy, Coral Ridge Ministries, 2007 From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany, Richard Weikart, Palgrave MacMillan, 2004.

  1. ^ Talkorigins Claim CA006.1: Adolf Hitler exploited the racist ideas of Darwinism to justify genocide, Mark Isaak, Index to Creationist Claims, Talkorigins, created 2001-4-29, modified 2005-7-1, © 2006
  2. ^ Creationists for Genocide, Hector Avalos, Talkreason

^ When Stein was interviewed by The New York Times, "He said he also believed the theory of evolution leads to racism and ultimately genocide, an idea common among creationist thinkers. If it were up to him, he said, the film would be called 'From Darwin to Hitler'" (Scientists Feel Miscast in Film on Life’s Origin, Cordelia Dean, The New York Times, September 27, 2007).

  1. ^ The evolution of creationism: After their notorious legal defeat, intelligent design proponents are resurfacing with insidious new assaults on science, Gordy Slack, Salon, November 13, 2007.
  2. ^ Darwinism: The Imperialism of Biology?, Ben Stein, Blog on Film official website, October 31, 2007.
  3. ^ Council Statement. The Biological Society of Washington. Retrieved on 2007-12-16.
  4. ^ News Service: Iowa State University. Statement from Iowa State University President Gregory Geoffroy. Iowa State University (June 1, 2007). Retrieved on 2007-12-16.
  5. ^ Iowa Citizens for Science - Gonzalez, Discovery Institute seek to replace science with politics, religion. Retrieved on 2007-12-16.
  6. ^ Darwin Goes to Church, Henry G. Brinton, Washington Post, September 18, 2005
  7. ^ "Crossroads" synopsis. Rampant Films. Retrieved on 2007-12-12., under "Properties" menu, select "Crossroads" icon
  8. ^ a b PZ Myers (2007-08-22). I'm gonna be a ☆ MOVIE STAR ☆. Pharyngula. Scienceblogs. Retrieved on 2007-09-28.
  9. ^ PZ Myers (2007-08-28). Expelled producer seems to be embarrassed about his sneaky tactics. Pharyngula. Scienceblogs. Retrieved on 2007-09-28.
  10. ^ a b Cornelia Dean (2007-09-27). Scientists Feel Miscast in Film on Life’s Origin. New York Times. Retrieved on 2007-09-28.
  11. ^ a b LifeSiteNews.com (2007-10-05). Atheist Scientists in Uproar. LifeSiteNews.com. Retrieved on 2007-10-05.
  12. ^ Ben Stein's Introductory Blog, Ben Stein, August 21, 2007.
  13. ^ MOVIE CONTEST Premise Media Corporation, Accessed Novemeber 2007
  14. ^ PZ Myers (October 24, 2007). Pharyngula: Official denial, unofficial endorsement. Pharyngula. Retrieved on 2007-12-16.
  15. ^ Kitzmiller v. Dover:4. Whether ID is Science
  16. ^ About. Colorado Confidential (July 3, 2006). Retrieved on 2007-12-18.
  17. ^ Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed - Four Stars, Tom Magnuson, Access Research Network blog, December 6, 2007.
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed/Reference_Analysis&oldid=1144810479"