Talk:Experian/Archives/2013
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Article improvements
Hi, I think many of you would agree that this article could be improved and developed further.
In the interest of transparency, I would like to state that Experian is a client and I would like to work with the editors of the page to ensure it is as accurate as it can be. I’m proposing to suggest improvements via this Talk page in order to do so.
My talk page is Source45 – please get in touch if you have any questions or feedback. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Source45 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
How best to integrate the U.S. Info Search/superget.info reports
Multiple sources are reporting today that they Experian sold data to a scam website, superget.info, via a subsidiary US Info Search. This seems like it should be included in the article, given the breadth of coverage, but how? Some sources: USA Today, Krebs on security (which broke the story), ZDNet, Information Week, and many others. Since it is a breaking story, and Wikipedia is not a news service, I am bringing it here to discuss how best to integrate this into the article. --TeaDrinker (talk) 21:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)