Talk:Exsudoporus frostii/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Sasata in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Short review needed. In Description, clarify 'hemispheric'.-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Sasata (talk) 05:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Cool. Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:33, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing. Sasata (talk) 07:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Cool. Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:33, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Results of review
editThe article Boletus frostii passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
- Pass/Fail: Pass