Talk:Exsudoporus frostii/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Sasata in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Short review needed. In Description, clarify 'hemispheric'.-- Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Done. Sasata (talk) 05:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Cool. Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:33, 18 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for reviewing. Sasata (talk) 07:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Results of review

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Boletus frostii passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass