Talk:Extended Christian Pact

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Translation

edit

I think that current translation is wrong, the correct name should be Extended Christian Pact --Maremmano (talk) 20:37, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

You are technically right, but is it really worth moving the page? --Checco (talk) 07:54, 29 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yes, if the translation is wrong the name has to be changed --Maremmano (talk) 19:30, 29 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Also National Fascist Party is not technically correct (wouldn't "Fascist National Party" be more correct?), but that is how the party is referred in most English-language texts, hence the article's name in en.Wikipedia. --Checco (talk) 10:34, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Extended Christian Pact. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply