Talk:Extended negative binomial distribution

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Proofs

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have had an e-mail complaining that I deleted a so-called proof. Simple proofs are against Wikipedia standards, see WP:NOTTEXTBOOK, although in special cases some are allowed according to WP:MOSMATH. The latter exceptions do not appply here. The supposed proof was of something so simple as not to be needed. The fact that some published paper might refer to Wikipedia for a proof is just plain stupid, as the rules of Wikipedia are clear: WP:OR says no original research can be included in Wikipedia, and that all original research should be deleted. Melcombe (talk) 10:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic