Talk:Extensive reading
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Faith.barnhill. Peer reviewers: TeachTESOL, Genipet, Elsen.gregory.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
References
editA number of problems here:
- External links in the Survey section
- Mixing footnotes,,shortened footnotes and parenthetical referencing
- Four footnotes not using {{citation}}, whereas most use {{citation}}
- Parenthetical references without a full citation:
- (Hill 2008)
- (Hill 1997)
- Full citation not used in-text:
- Furukawa, A. (2005)
Limits
editthe "Limits" section is probably NPOV ("convincingly") and needs the grammar and style to be improved. 202.179.22.106 (talk) 04:09, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Extensive Reading in Chinese
editThe text says "As of 2008, readers [books] are notably absent or scarce" in Chinese. But now I think the Chinese Breeze series of graded readers by the Peking University Press, with about 20 volume in levels 1--3, fills that gap. They certainly enable people to read 50 page stories for pleasure. Unless "extensive reading" is understood as a very specific more or less trademarked concept, I think http://www.chinesebreeze.net/ should be added to the links. Colin McLarty (talk) 21:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC) FLTRP
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Extensive reading. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130406095845/http://www.mhe-cyoa.com/ to http://www.mhe-cyoa.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121031034211/http://www.richmondelt.com/spain/english/catalogue/supp_graded-readers/default.htm to http://www.richmondelt.com/spain/english/catalogue/supp_graded-readers/default.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Explain extensive and intensive reading
editI need this 2401:4900:231A:46F9:1:1:A6EA:2807 (talk) 01:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
English
editUnder which circumstance extensive reading is required and why 103.167.254.254 (talk) 09:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Really—this is a thing?
editOkay, let me get this straight: Lots of reading is good for kids, and it helps people learn, and people should be encouraged to read a lot every day, and to read things they enjoy? Sorry, but this needs a bunch of researchers and scholars weighing in on it? Couldn't we just describe it as I have above, and break for lunch? 🤷♂️ – AndyFielding (talk) 17:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC)