Talk:Extinct in the wild

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Otter246 in topic Wiki Education assignment: Conservation Biology

Dictionary definition?

edit

What could one possibly say about this, beyond defining it, that doesn't belong in the Extinction article? Jkelly 02:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Smallpox

edit

Is smallpox an animal? 70.58.27.194 09:35, 1 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

no, it's an Acytotus. I think that was a sort of joke/fun fact, and not really a relevant piece of the article (that is, I don't think small pox has that IUCN status). A1s 20:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Smallpox was removed then returned to the article. If it's a joke, it's not terribly amusing. Can it be forcibly deleted? Hovea 02:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Species examples

edit

Could there be an explanation which of those mentioned are subspecies? Because the first one, barbary lion, is a subspecies. Lion is not extinct in the wild, but only one its subspecies. As such the Species header is inaccurate. 85.217.35.50 (talk) 02:58, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Where does it say "Species" in a header? The lede says "species or lower taxa", and under the "Examples" header it says "species and subspecies". -- Donald Albury 15:30, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Somebody just changed it. I think, though, that the IUCN considers some ssubspecies "endangered species". (In the U.S., even populations in a geographic area can be "endangered species".) —innotata 16:01, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I just realized that. I hadn't noticed the edit to the article page earlier. -- Donald Albury 20:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
That was me. It seemed to me that regardless of whether or not it is technically correct for IUCN, since we are writing for an audience that may not know anything about IUCN, it would not hurt to be a bit more specific. Donlammers (talk) 15:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
I don't think most people know the distinction between species and subspecies, or get it, and I think the rationale between that concept of "endangered species" is that taxonomic status doesn't matter so much for conservation. But what you added is fine, I'd say. —innotata 16:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Conservation Dependent - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 18:00, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Lonesome George

edit

Lonesome George is now dead — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.84.78.242 (talk) 01:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

The article already reflected the fact at the time you commented. —innotata 13:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Domestic animals

edit

Are any common domestic animals extinct in the wild? I'm thinking of animals that you would probably not consider rare or endangered when you heard their names, but that only survive in captivity. The article cites an aquarium fish; do more exist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.81.0 (talk) 04:14, 12 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Capitalisation of conservation statuses

edit

Please see the ongoing discussion on Talk:Conservation status#Capitalisation of conservation statuses.
Coreyemotela (talk) 14:18, 1 June 2014 (UTC).Reply

Rename talk page error

edit

Seeing that all the other conservation statuses were lower case and it looks like this one was missed, I tried changing this article to lower case. I accidentally did the talk page rather than the article and that worked, but I can't move the article to match it. Now I can't reverse the change I made to the talk page to make it match the article page again. I will do a requested move from Extinct in the Wild to Extinct in the wild to fix this. Sorry about the confusion. SchreiberBike talk 22:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit

Extinct in the WildExtinct in the wild – Following a conversation at Talk:Conservation status#Capitalisation of conservation statuses also linked to above, all the other conservation statuses were changed to lower case. See: Critically endangered, Not evaluated, etc. It seems appropriate for this page to match those. See section immediately above regarding the talk page. Note that that error also confuses the requested move template and makes it appear that the move will not change the name. SchreiberBike talk 22:54, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Extinct in the wild. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Conservation Biology

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 1 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ungulate01 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Cat241912.

— Assignment last updated by Otter246 (talk) 22:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply