Talk:Extracellular fluid
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Transcellular fluid page were merged into Extracellular fluid on 16 March 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
editMy name is Dylan Newcomb and I am editing this page on Extracellular Fluid for a project at Waynesville High School under the supervision of Mr.Travis Bohrer (User:tbohrer74).
Proposed merge with Interstitial fluid
editIt's the major part of extracellular fluid and is discussed extensively on target page; there is also a lot of duplicated material there. Iztwoz (talk) 19:17, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support: This one makes sense too, provided the merge is done carefully. They're both pretty big pages. PureRED | talk to me | 04:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Transcellular fluid
editSmall stub - is component of target page and better presented there Iztwoz (talk) 21:06, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Support: Makes sense to me! PureRED | talk to me | 04:17, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Interstitium
editI got re-directed to this page from interstitium, but there is only interstitial in the article. I wanted to find out about interstitium because of this article (http://www.newser.com/story/257129/newly-identified-human-organ-serves-as-shock-absorber.html?utm_source=8at8&utm_medium=email&utm_content=1636578345455706803&utm_campaign=20180328), which cites a New Scientist article, which does not use the term. Time magazine also uses the term: http://time.com/5217273/human-body-organ-interstitium/ .Kdammers (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Recent Declaration of Interstitium as an Organ
editWhile it's not used in that way in the paper cited (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-23062-6), many sources are calling it a newly discovered organ. https://twitter.com/LiveScience/status/978587252677689344/ http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2018/03/27/interstitium-new-organ-human-body/ and https://www.livescience.com/62128-interstitium-organ.html as some examples. Perhaps a new "Organ" section on this page or a separate page detailing this usage would be appropriate? Adeckofcards (talk) 18:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)