Talk:Fábio Aurélio

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

what recent statements?

edit

"Recent statements from Liverpool cast doubt as to whether or not he will join the Anfield side." this was just added, but I can find no source to back it up, so for now it's removed. Anyone got further details? aLii 19:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, seeing as he's been at Liverpool for a month and played several matches, I think it was pretty safe to remove it. --Stevefarrell 10:44, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Replying to 1½ month old posts, with the benefit of hindsight does tend to make things more obvious, yes. aLii 08:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Height

edit

Before changing the height from 1.78 m to 1.80 m again, please give some good reasons not to trust these sources:

and there are others... I think that from a verifiability point of view we should list his height as 1.78 m.

aLii 15:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

So why is he now listed as 1.75 m rather than 1.78 m? Gene Nygaard 16:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Old post to reply to, but now he's listed as 1.73m! Lukeno94 (talk) 16:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

page move

edit

I've moved this page back from "Fábio Aurélio Rodrigues". Though that is his full correct name, the article title should use the most common name whenever possible: Hence Bill Clinton, and not William Jefferson Clinton. All sources for this article drop the second surname for Aurelio. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 15:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Totally agree. My benchmark for footballers is what name do they have on the back of their shirt? --Ged UK (talk) 17:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Fábio Aurélio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fábio Aurélio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply