Talk:Fänrik

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Note. All alternations that do not include prior discussion and reasons for the change will be ignored!

Untitled 2

edit

Creator of the article: Malin Randstrom —Preceding unsigned comment added by Malin Tokyo (talkcontribs) 06:18, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Reply

Please refer to Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. On the other hand, all contributions naturally need to conform to relevant Wikipedia policies & guidelines. Tomas e (talk) 17:05, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Modification MalinLindquist 04:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

edit
  • added "as Private" to the rank box

Modification Doktor Musmatta Commissioned Officer

edit

Fänrik is the lowest commissioned officer rank.

Reply: Comissioned Officer

edit

As a result of a reform (Ny Befals Ordning, eary 1980s), NCO, WO, CO were all made officers with the lowest rank set to Fanrik. Also, new officers no longer receive an officer’s commission (Officers fullmakt). That is, a Fanrik is an officer without commission. In other words a non-commissioned officer (NCO). An active officer who was made an officer before 1980 is, indeed, a commissioned officer. However, there should be no one in service today.

Therefore, we should use the more general term officer here.

--Malin Randstrom (talk) 14:46, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

As this rank is the lowest profesional military rank in Sweden, I changed it accordingly. --Malin Randstrom (talk) 15:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge suggestion

edit

If merged to Second Lieutenant, material on officer's training in Sweden could be salvaged to another article on that subject. Tomas e (talk) 18:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reply: Merge Suggestion

edit

Thank you for your suggestion to merge with Second Lieutenant. Currently, this rank does not at all correspond to Second Lieutenant even though it is translated officially to this by the Swedish Armed Forces. Due to the major confusion regarding Swedish ranks cased by the implemenation of the NBO reform 1983, a new two-career-path system is being implemented that will elevate this rank closer to Second Lieutenant. NBO 83 is a very unfortunate social experiment (absurd) where all military personnel should be officers with the lowest professional rank set to Fanrik. You are certainly aware of the hyper inflation of Swedish ranks while the ranks of other nations such as in the US Army and USCM have been constant. In effect Fanrik become what corporals use to be.

The educational information is part of defining the rank and I agree that it should be put somewhere else with a link from this page to that page.

--Malin Randstrom (talk) 13:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Officers training and cadets sction

edit

The section has been moved away to a separate article as suggested --Malin Randstrom (talk) 07:21, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Edits regarding vänrikki

edit

I appreciate all your edits; but your claim that a vänrikki, who has only 12 months of military service, is assigned as commander of a battery or company upon mobilization seems very unlikely. Please verify this. --Malin Randstrom (talk) 05:56, 28 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

A vänrikki will not be assigned a company commander duty. That requires subsequent training in refresher exercises and promotion to at least first lieutenant (yliluutnantti). However, a battery commander duty is much easier and reserve officers are trained to act in such positions during their conscription. --MPorciusCato (talk) 20:16, 30 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fänrik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fänrik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply