Redlinks, no mention in any linked articles, nothing to disambiguate

edit

Removed from the disambiguation page as there is no article and no target supporting the usage. olderwiser 13:54, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

red links are not a bad thing, or something that should be removed from a page. It is just indicating that there is nothing yet written on a subject. In this case it is highlighting that there is more than one castle with the name Fürstenberg, thus reducing the risk someone reads the about the wrong one. --Traveler100 (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Please see MOS:DABRL for guidelines about inclusion of redlinks on disambiguation pages. Disambiguation pages are navigational aids and should in general have at least one navigable blue link that provides verifiable information about the subject. Where there is no article and no verifable information supporting a particular use, there is nothing to disambiguate. Disambiguation pages should not contain details that are unsupported by other articles. olderwiser 15:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply