This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the F-Secure article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Number of offices
editThe article contradicts itself in the first two sentences about the number of offices:
- F-Secure Corporation [...] with over 30 offices [...]
- The company has nearly 30 offices [...]
Which number is true at the moment (May/June 2022), more than 30 offices or less? Both numbers have been set/edited in December 2020. --Hermodurin (talk) 13:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Redirect
editSince the name F-Secure Corporation is bolded, and I assume an official name (this is how I attempted to originally get to this page), how about a redirect from F-Secure Corporation to here? 73.173.14.14 (talk) 12:54, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Company Logo
editCould someone add the F-Secure company logo to this page? It is available in a press kit here: http://www.f-secure.com/en_EMEA-Corp/pressroom/gallery/logos/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayhaymate (talk • contribs) 13:12, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:F-Secure logo.svg
editImage:F-Secure logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on F-Secure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111231194253/http://www.technologyacademy.fi:80/cto-of-the-year-award.html to http://www.technologyacademy.fi/cto-of-the-year-award.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120118172632/http://www.av-comparatives.org/en/comparativesreviews/false-alarm-tests to http://www.av-comparatives.org/en/comparativesreviews/false-alarm-tests
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Controversy section has very poor sourcing
editThe only source is a broken link. Please fix this or remove the section completely. BoatyKappa (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2019 (UTC)