Talk:F-ratio
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Shibbolethink in topic Requested move 23 August 2021
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 23 August 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from F-ratio (disambiguation) to F-ratio. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 23 August 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. per discussion consensus and PTOPIC. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 02:09, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
– Based on a Google search of "f-ratio", it would appear that the term is more commonly used to refer to the ANOVA statistic. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Support the Wikipedia article F-test not F-ratio comes up in Google and F-ratio gets 126 views while F-number gets 14,404 and F-distribution gets 7,467[[1]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Support While I mostly wrote the oceanographic article (at least its earlier revisions), I can see that it's not really the best item to hog the coveted F-ratio slot. Cheers, —PLUMBAGO 09:47, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.