Talk:FAAC

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Please, keep the contents of this page (and add to it), as this is a work-in-progress that will be incremented until it can substitute the redirection. Rogério Brito (talk) 01:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Free Software

edit

Unfortunately, it turned out that FAAC never was Free Software, it always contained code from the ISO reference encoder that is definitely proprietary software. Nowadays, the homepage explains this (but this was only a change of the text on the homepage, the code is the same as before). CE --192.35.241.121 (talk) 09:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Why FAAD*2*?

edit

Why is it FAAD2? Is it a second version - i.e. was there ever an "FAAD1"? Jimw338 (talk) 19:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Is FDK nonfree?

edit

The article says: "The fifth is the (nonfree) libfdk-aac, the Fraunhofer FDK AAC library, which is purported to be a "high quality" aac implementation." Is this accurate? Unless I'm misinterpreting something, this is the license for the linked codec, and it appears to be reasonably free and open... Jesin (talk) 21:08, 31 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Very late, but I think the problem is that it can't be distributed as a binary because of patents. The license included in the source code by Fraunhofer lets the code be distributed, it even says binary distribution is allowed, but it doesn't license the patented technologies. It goes on to say that it can only be distributed as authorized by patent licenses, which significantly impacts (you might even say retracts or contradicts) the earlier statement. --Bp0 (talk) 21:15, 27 September 2014 (UTC) (edited)Reply
By the way, there is an article for this encoder at Fraunhofer FDK AAC. --Bp0 (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on FAAC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on FAAC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply