Talk:FC Groningen/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk · contribs) 16:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'll be picking this one up. Hopefully this becomes a good article! ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 16:49, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Language and Grammar looks good.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Good enough.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   It is a proffesional football club, and has plenty of data on it. This is a pass.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Nominator is neutural to the subject, and no signs of bias are being shown in the article.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images look good

7. Overall: Article looks great, so I will be passing it! ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 14:42, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

   Pass/Fail: