Talk:FISA of 1978 Amendments Act of 2008

Untitled

"If you come across an article whose content does not seem to be consistent with Wikipedia's NPOV policy, use one of the tags below to mark the article's main page. Then, on the article's talk page, make a new section entitled "NPOV dispute [- followed by a section's name if you're challenging just a particular section of the article and not the article as a whole]". Then, under this new section, clearly and exactly explain which part of the article does not seem to have a NPOV and why. Make some suggestions as to how one can improve the article. Be active and bold in improving the article."

I don't see any clear and exact explanation. I will come back in a week, if there isn't a clear and exact explanation i will remove the NPOV notification.

Fregle (talk) 15:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

I've done you one better and removed the tag. -- Kendrick7^talk 18:24, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

can someone link this to the FISA disambiguation page. Might save some confusion to those trying to find this topic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.53.115.47 (talk) 16:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

This article contains bullets from a source with a biased viewpoint, rather than from the text of the bill itself. See the Provisions section. Dosman! (talk) 19:19, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

The source is an AP article. Are you saying the AP article has a biased viewpoint? Also, the last five of the ten bullets come from the article. The first five appear to be derived from information contained in the article. ~Pesco^{So say•we all} 21:23, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Just fix any problems, please, per WP:BOLD -- Kendrick7^talk 15:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

This article got more into the controversy than being a descriptive of the topic and saying what the act is. Perhaps this should be retitled 'FISA controversy 2008' Markbassett (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:47, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 Amendments Act of 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060206162614/http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/1216-01.htm to http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/1216-01.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

FISA Title I vs FISA 702 or called FISA Title I vs FISA Title VII

In addition to the Attorney General’s approval, Section 704 now requires an order from the FISC,finding that there is probable cause to believe that the targeted U.S. person is a “foreign power, an agent of a foreign power, or an officer or employee of a foreign power,” as defined under Title I of FISA, and that the target is a person reasonably believed to be located outside the United States. Like section 2.5 of Executive Order 12333, Section 704 applies in circumstances in which the target has “a reasonable expectation of privacy and a warrant would be required if the acquisition were conducted inside the United States for law enforcement purposes.” By requiring the approval of the FISC, Section 704 provides additional civil liberties protection
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/06-27-17%20Brooker-Evans-Morris-Ghattas%20Joint%20Testimony.pdf — Preceding unsigned
--OxAO (talk) 11:07, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

FUBAR

can they make stuff up as they go along the way and put in whatever they need at that time 2607:FB91:184:1370:C9B5:2009:180F:4DEB (talk) 05:13, 13 July 2023 (UTC)