Talk:Face validity
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editDoes anyone have any problems with added the observations of Anastasi?
Face validity is not validity in the technical sense; it refers not to what the test actually measures, but to what it appears superficially to measure. Face validity pertains to whether the test “looks valid” to the examinees who take it, the administrative personnel who decide on its use, and other technically untrained observers.
-Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: MacMillan. p. 144.
Jmbrowne (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, my name is Michael Trowers, I am working on an assignment. I would like to edit your page with some additional information http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mtrowers/sandbox Mtrowers (talk) 23:37, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Mtrowers (talk) 18:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Contrasted with or distinguished from
editThis article says that face validity is often "contrasted with" construct validity and content validity. Would it not be better to say that it is often distinguished from construct validity and content validity? Vorbee (talk) 16:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)