Talk:Faces (Star Trek: Voyager)/GA1

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Aoba47 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 20:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply


Grabbing for a review. Had a quick skim already - looks really good. Miyagawa (talk) 20:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

There are a couple of links to User:Aoba47 that need fixing. Mr Stephen (talk) 21:55, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

I thought it would be something like that. Mr Stephen (talk) 09:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ok, let's get the review started.

  • Lead: Duplicate link to Biller in the first paragraph (also in the infobox)
  • Fixed.
  • "The episode received Nielsen ratings of 6.1/10 percent, and saw a decrease from the previous week" - you could switch the comma for a semicolon and remove "and saw"
  • Fixed.
  • Plot: "is deemed to ill to work" - "too" rather than "to"
  • Fixed.
  • Fixed.
  • "caught for communicating to Voyager" - I think "with" would be better than "to"
  • Fixed.
  • Writing: Would it be possible to mention when the Vidiians were first introduced? (in Phage (Star Trek: Voyager)) Third paragraph would be the most appropriate location.
  • Fixed.
  • Separation of B'Elanna Torres: "The cast and crew pent some time" - I presume "spent"
  • Fixed.
  • "while the Klingon did not have logic r control" - is that "logic or control"?
  • Fixed.
  • "actress Joy Kilpatrick was casted as Dawson's" - just cast; apparently casted fell out use in the middle ages (although I'm sure we have a Wiki for that version of English!)
  • Fixed.
  • Critical reception: Pipe a link at TrekToday through to TrekNation
  • Fixed.
@Aoba47: No other issues found. The free use image is a good choice and located in the optimum position. It's mostly use a bunch of typos. Will be happy to pass this when you've taken a look - a good job and interesting read. Miyagawa (talk) 12:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.