Talk:Facing the World
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Facing the World article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
A fact from Facing the World appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 February 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Possible sources
editBoosting children’s 'face value', confidence, Việt Nam News
Social News 17/10, vietnam.net. Doesn't have a WP-article, but may not be awful. FWIW, we use it in other places:[1]
Vietnamese children get help to face the world The Sunday Guardian Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:07, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Some more: [2][3][4]. I don't think WP:NOTABLE is a problem, but of course we need to get that into the article. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:19, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Proposed replacement article
editPart of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. Please see the Reply section below for additional information about this request. |
I am a volunteer for the charity this article is about. The page needs updating because of developments within the charity, but I understand that I may be seen to have a COI, hence the edit request.
The article that follows is intended to replace the existing entry entirely.
Please let me know of any problems. Many thanks in advance.
Extended content
|
---|
Facing the World(FTW)[1] is a UK-based charity that seeks to help children in Vietnam with devastating facial disfigurements. The focus is educational, with FTW providing training in craniofacial surgery, through its Fellowship Program, to doctors across Vietnam so that surgery can be offered to increasing numbers of children.[2]
Founded in 2003, for the greater part of its history FTW has been been active in Vietnam. This is because the occurrence of birth defects in Vietnam is estimated to be some 10 times higher than in neighbouring countries. Since 2008, the charity has run missions in which its surgeons operate on children with craniofacial defects and provide on-site training for the local teams. In 2014, Da Nang General Hospital and the charity co-hosted the first national Vietnam Craniofacial Conference.
FTW's reach in Vietnam has expanded over time, and the charity now has intensive collaborations not only with Da Nang General Hospital[3] but also with Hong Ngoc Hospital[4], Viet-Duc University Hospital[5] and, recently, 108 Military Hospital in Hanoi. Further appropriate hospitals will be added to its program. Fellowships in the UK for Vietnamese doctors are key to the charity’s overall success. Visiting doctors shadow FTW surgeons, and observe and learn new techniques and approaches. These fellowships are then built on during missions to the hospitals in Vietnam where UK and Vietnamese teams jointly operate and put the new approaches and techniques to use. Recently, FTW has begun working with The Toronto Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), who are now also hosting Vietnamese doctors under the FTW Fellowship Program. In addition to its training program, FTW seeks to enable donations of vital equipment to its partner hospitals that will improve efficiency, and enable increasing numbers of operations to be performed. Equipment needs are identified in collaboration with the hospitals. The charity is run primarily by volunteers. All the doctors donate their time as does the CEO (Trustee).
Official status in Vietnam has been granted through Paccom registration. The charity has signed Memorandum of Understanding agreements with VAVA (Vietnam Association of Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin)[6], the Vietnam Red Cross and Direct Relief[7]. FTW has a Vietnamese patron and two long-term financial supporters, giving it a sound platform from which to continue to expand its services throughout Vietnam. The charity was commended by the UK’s Prime Minister with a Points of Light award[8] in recognition of excellence, and has been awarded the prestigious award for “Peace and Friendship among Nations” from the Vietnam Union of Friendship Organizations[9]. The charity has received the official endorsement of the UK All-Party Parliamentary Group for Vietnam and the Vietnam-UK Network. Most recently, the highest State award in Vietnam, the Government Friendship Medal, was awarded to Katrin Kandel (FTW's Voluntary CEO) and Facing The World.[10] References
|
Emmeliss (talk) 23:49, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Reply to edit request 21-OCT-2018
editBelow you will see where proposals from your request have been quoted with reviewer decisions and feedback inserted underneath, either accepting, declining or otherwise commenting upon your proposal(s). Please read the enclosed notes for information on each request. Spintendo 15:09, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Edit Request Review section 21-OCT-2018
|
---|
|
Request to remove page
editGood evening. I have just seen your latest edit. Thank you for this, but in particular citation 5 does not reflect what the charity now does - the reason for the wholesale revision I have tried to make so unsuccesfully. I agree the page is far from adequate. Is it possible to remove it entirely? It would be better to have no page at all than something which may mislead.
Thank you for the help you have given to date - it is genuinely appreciated. It's just that I have no time available at the moment to get the article up to Wikipedia standard, and I think everyone would agree it is not good as it stands.