Talk:FactCheck.org
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the FactCheck.org article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on FactCheck.org. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/current.php?season%3D16
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130420045855/http://factcheck.org/about/ to http://factcheck.org/about/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141208094242/https://factcheckeu.org/ to https://factcheckeu.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Removed a vague sentence without valid source.
editThis sentence was added a few months ago (by @Lightest), and has had two different citations, neither of which actually supported the inclusion of the sentence: "This fact-checking tool is not externally evaluated."
The currently cited source says "None found" under the heading "Are there external evaluations?" That is not documentation that the site either is or isn't "externally evaluated," even if it were clear what the editor meant by "externally evaluated." The first citation the editor used, didn't contain anything supporting the sentence at all, as best I can tell - I read over it a few times and didn't find anything relevant. Thus, I have removed the sentence. If it's going to be added again, it needs a proper citation and probably some links clarifying what is meant by "externally evaluated." Without a proper source, it's far too vague and subjective to be encyclopedic. CleverTitania (talk) 06:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)