Talk:Fair Tax Mark

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 23 January 2016 by reviewer Devopam (talk · contribs).

Taxation (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

'Reception' section "...contains content that is written like an advertisement...[etc]"?

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The template is: "Advert section|date= January 2016" and the resulting text in the article is "This section contains content that is written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view. (January 2016)".

I have done most of the creation of this article to date, and have attempted to have NPOV etc. I cannot work out why this section has been tagged in this way. I admit that most of content of this section is has a positive view of the topic, but that is what I found was being said about it. There are two negative views included as well.

Maybe it is the style of writing of this section that makes it sound like an advert(?)

Just to be clear: I have no personal links with the subject of this article. FrankSier (talk) 23:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Awardees section

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Have I missed something? 24 awardees against a target of 350 to be met in three months - is the list on their website complete as that's all I can find? BurmeseCatMan (talk) 14:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic