Talk:Fairfield, Nebraska
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Photo
edit
Is there a problem with this photo? User:Silverojo has repeatedly deleted it from the infobox, without an edit summary and without replacing it with another or arguing for its inappropriateness on this page. I am at a loss to understand this. The picture depicts downtown Fairfield, without representing the town in a false light; it doesn't show an identifiable person doing something embarrassing; and it doesn't depict a local business in a fashion that might be construed as spam. If Silverojo has identified a problem with it, then that problem should be discussed here on the talk page. Ammodramus (talk) 02:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- I hope this is the right method for communicating...Wikipedia is very convoluted and confusing. I would like to settle this amicably.
- I deleted this photo because I honestly believed you were vandalizing this Wikipedia page. The photo depicts Fairfield in an extremely unflattering manner, by showing several abandoned buildings more prominently than the businesses that are thriving.
- Even if the photo had not been so unflattering, it is not good etiquette to remove someone else's photo and replace it with your own. ADDING a photo to the page is one thing, but removing my photo was inappropriate. In the future, please refrain from removing other people's images from Wikipedia entries. Thank you.
- I have edited the page to include both our photos, which should be satisfactory.
- I can live with User:Silverojo's latest edit. I have to disagree that my preferred photo is misleading or unflattering. It shows a main street at least two blocks long, with enough parked cars to suggest that business is taking place there. The red-barn fronted building in the foreground, "The Butcher Shop Inc." is not abandoned; it's also visually different than the typical main-street building in a small Nebraska town, which lends Fairfield a touch of distinctiveness.
- I replaced Silverojo's original photo because I didn't think that it conveyed a true impression of the town. It shows a single block, with four unconnected one-story buildings. If I hadn't known otherwise, I would have assumed that that was all the downtown there was, and that Fairfield's business district was much smaller than it actually is.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Fairfield, Nebraska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6HQu4Spqa?url=http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64vfLAeJ2?url=http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html - Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)