Talk:Falck (emergency services company)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Shhhnotsoloud in topic Merger proposal

Merger proposal

edit

Falck USA and Falck are two separate operations and shouldn't be linked. My research of the company shows that the USA is a wholly owned subsidiary with a large growth potential in the USA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SDPM84 (talkcontribs) 02:54, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Merge tag removed. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The article is poorly referenced and reads like an advertisment.

edit

I can't help feeling the article is copied from a a marketing piece or written by someone in its staff. Information like head quarters, CEO, etc are missing. Also it says "Falck is currently in charge of 65 percent" but the reference is a 2009 document, might need rewording "as of 2009" or find a newer reference 130.228.251.5 (talk) 14:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Falck (Denmark). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply