Talk:Falcon 9 B1048
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:36, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Overturning non-consensus decided decision to remove B1048
edit@Mfb: @Insertcleverphrasehere: @C-randles: @JFG: @Fcrary: @OkayKenji: @Gial Ackbar: Unfortunately, a lot of these important articles have been deleted without any of us being notified about the move. I agree it may seem much, I only intended to do B1046 and B1048 but ended up doing B1047 and started a trend which resulted in more. But these articles allow for much more information. Some of the articles like B1050, B1051 can remain deleted for now, pending further discussion but significant ones, especially B1046 and B1048 with their reusability milestone significance, deserve their own article. Their info cannot be stored in List of Falcon 9 first stage Boosters or the main article. I move on this page B1048 be re-instated. - AndrewRG10 (talk) 9:57, February 16 2020 (UTC)
- B1048 has been re-instated due to the undeniable significance this booster has and will have into the future. Please leave comments and arguments for deletion below. --AndrewRG10 (talk) 02:53, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- The page has been re-reviewed in the past few hours. --AndrewRG10 (talk) 09:52, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC)