Talk:Falkands War order of battle: British air forces
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Falkands War order of battle: British air forces article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RAF unit identities
editI can't find the right answer at the moment, but the inclusion of RAF 54 Squadron with Vulcans on this page must be a mistake. It has been a Jaguar unit based at Coltishall for ages, certainly before 1982. Dyvroeth 15:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Requested move
editWhen the RAF, the Fleet Air Arm and the Army Air Corps are grouped together, they are normally called the British air services, not the British air forces. I propose that this page be moved to British air services in the Falklands War. Greenshed 23:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'd never thought of that before! I'm PRO-move. Necessary Evil 00:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Format
editIs there a particular reason why Fleet Air Arm has a table and RAF did not ? --Jor70 (talk) 03:26, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Probably because the FAA made the principal contribution to the campaign. Though I agree one is warranted. Justin talk 11:41, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- ADD looking again, the information could be presented in a table and it would be much clearer. Justin talk 11:51, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Discussion
editThere is chilean editor trying to edit Argentine air forces in the Falklands War with a list of things that the FAA/COAN could not did. Is anyone here supporting the same idea for this article ? .e.g 1) Harriers could not destroy Stanley runway, 2) Vulcans neither, 3) Harrier can not prevent daily Hercules transport flights to Stanley 4) The British armed forces do not have enough helicopters , etc, etc Personally, I think is all crap but we need a concensus according rules --Jor70 (talk) 21:57, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Per my comments there provided there is a NPOV text with due coverage of all the issues, then that might be appropriate. What isn't is relying on a single source without analysis coverage all issues per WP:DUE. Justin talk 11:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
There is a mis-match between the number of losses of aircraft in the "Air Campaign" listings, and the in the casualty list. Can anyone put an explanation into the text please? Markjeff (talk) 09:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on British air services in the Falklands War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061202084602/http://www.fuerzaaerea.mil.ar:80/conflicto/index_conflicto.html to http://www.fuerzaaerea.mil.ar/conflicto/index_conflicto.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on British air services in the Falklands War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150719174707/http://www.thenewscentre.co.uk/falklands/flier.htm to http://www.thenewscentre.co.uk/falklands/flier.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fuerzaaerea.mil.ar/conflicto/index_conflicto.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)