Talk:Family Dollar/Archive 1

Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:Familydollarlogopng.PNG

Image:Familydollarlogopng.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Familydollarlogopng.PNG

Image:Familydollarlogopng.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Untitled

Not sure why it was classified as a "North Carolina" chain--Maddux31holytrinity 09:49, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

• Because its headquarters are in the state. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:46, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

How do they do it

A section or at least a paragraph or two needs to be put in on how they can afford to sell items for only $1 and still pay for their transportation, shelf space, rent the space the store is in, etc. How much of the material is surplus, given to the store for three, how much is "slightly defective" etc? Readers of an encyclopedia and consumers in general would want to know.

--Working in a Distribution Center, I see a lot of their product. It doesn't seem to be defective, I believe a lot of it has to do with the fact that instead of getting direct shipments from factories/suppliers right to every store's door, they centralize it into warehouses, which are then sent to the stores. A lot of the product is not brand-name, but brand-names are still offered. They use a highly-efficient conveyor system to get product from A to B, which saves time and money, along with the fact that they use only sparse employment at the stores. Some of their generic products are indeed low-grade however, and that is how they are able to keep prices back.

--The real drive is to be able to put as much as possible in with as little cost as possible, as explained above. The driving factor in most distribution centers is the Cost of Case, or in other words, how much does it cost to get this case X from the inbound door to the outbound door? Though many items are priced at $1, they are not shipped individually (of course), and with some packages holding up to 48 or more of the item, $0.50 or so for the $50 of product is a great trade.

This is not a true dollar store, so a lot of what is in the first paragraph wouldn't apply. But the rest are valid concerns.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 22:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)