Talk:Fantasy Magazine (2005)

Magazines Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Awards & Mentions section and general structure

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The length of the Awards & Mentions section is a bit over the top. In general, I suggest using the articles for comparable, more established magazines such as F&SF as a model. Other the article is at risk of a Promotional tag and harsh edits by people who know nothing about the magazine. --Pleasantville (talk) 12:57, 24 November 2009 (UTC) aka Kathryn CramerReply

Even now it reeks of padding the resume to encompass every good story it's ever published. Instead, how about some actual, y'know, reliable third-party sources? --Orange Mike | Talk 22:15, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi - Apologies if I post this note to the wrong section. I'm not Wikipedia-savvy. The Fantasy Magazine page needs updating. There've been changes at Fantasy Magazine. New editor, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.221.206.186 (talk) 07:42, 5 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic