Talk:Far Side Virtual

Far Side Virtual is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Far Side Virtual has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 23, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
May 24, 2014	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 21, 2013.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that James Ferraro originally intended to release his 2011 album Far Side Virtual as a set of ringtones?

Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Electronic music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Far Side Virtual/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 23:18, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'll be glad to take this review; sorry you've had to wait so long for one. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-3 days. Thanks in advance for your work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:18, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Checklist

I see no GA-level issues on an initial pass, so I'll go straight to the checklist here. Thanks for your work on this; it looks quite solid. The only quibble I can find so far, which isn't a GA criteria issue, is that MOS:QUOTE mostly forbids use of wikilinks inside quotations, which this article does heavily; none of these links seem unreasonable, however. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:29, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Spotchecks show no evidence of copyright issues.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Some of these publications may be a bit borderline for reliable sources, but I don't see any that seem unacceptable.
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Technically I believe even the infobox image is supposed to have a caption. "Far Side Virtual album cover"? Since this is so basic a point, I'll just take care of this myself.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass as GA

FAC ping

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please ping me if this article goes back up for FAC in the future and I'll do my best to give it a review czar ♔ 04:30, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic