Talk:Farahnaz Pahlavi
 | This article was nominated for deletion on Jan 4 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
References
editShe is not the primary subject of all references added to the article. Consider the BBC link, for one. I recommend you check some of the others before I do, as I suspect the Berkshire article does not have her as the primary subject. I suspect others too do not have her as primary subject, based upon titles, as she is not the "widow", and usually titles regard the primary subject. I will check these all at some point, but for the sake of improving the article, I suggest that you go through them to make sure she is THE primary subject, according to WP:BIO.
Your source for the dam does not say that it was named after her. This is original research. See WP:OR for further details about this Wikipedia policy.
Once the references have been winnowed based upon satisfying the primary criteria of WP:BIO, the other criteria can be applied.
Simply adding references will not solve problems with this article. The references have to qualify for inclusion as well. Thanks. The Behnam 17:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- With all due respect, The Behnam, I haven't read anywhere that an article used as a reference has to be solely (or even primarily) about the Wiki subject. As long as the reference supports the assertion from the Wiki, it satisfies WP:CITE. I just stumbled upon this article, so I have no stake in it. But I think it's better to apply policy consistently, and as it is written, not just how one wishes to interpret it. Jeffpw 08:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- My comment was a long time ago, but the idea behind establishing notability is being featured as a primary subject in articles of a certain caliber (independent, reliable, etc). The Behnam 03:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
As of January 8, 2011 this article shows that this woman died "January 2011 at the age of 47", but I believe that her brother and sister are dead, not her. The notation is curiously typed and does not look like the rest of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.16.219 (talk) 18:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
How is she a "princess" when the regime that recognized such titles/names no longer exists? chauvinistic, nationalistic...monarchical titles...get over it people... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.104.182 (talk) 09:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Basalam
editBa Salam To Farhanav Pahlavi 2600:1011:B057:219B:C447:162D:CEC7:1DB6 (talk) 07:00, 6 June 2024 (UTC)