Talk:Fashion boot

Images

Having difficulty finding free-use images for this article, especially for historical material. As an alternative, I've included links to specimen records from the Cordwainers College collection of historical footwear as references. Biffthree (talk) 18:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

References

After some initial difficulties, changed all web references to standardized Wikipedia template. Biffthree (talk) 04:00, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

External links

I removed two links from the External links section per WP:EL.

• http://www.bethlevineshoes.com/ seems like pure spam to me. WP:ELNO reason #5.
• http://coololdstuff.com/gogoboots.html does not add any material that cannot be incorporated into the article with it as a source. WP:ELNO reason #1.

Please discuss if you want to reinstate them. --Muhandes (talk) 07:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

File:KylieMinogue 39.JPG Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:KylieMinogue 39.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests - No timestamp given What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:52, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

2017: Year of the Boot II: Bring Back the pointed toes.

2017 would be the year of the boot Part II. We must bring back stylish early-mid 2000s boots with pointed toes, so 2017 would be the new 2001.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fashion boot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629185733/http://www.buckscc.gov.uk/bcc/museum/object/object.page to http://www.buckscc.gov.uk/bcc/museum/object/object.page
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100510202535/http://coololdstuff.com:80/gogoboots.html to http://coololdstuff.com/gogoboots.html/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110430151040/http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk:80/article/TMG8474134/Step-into-this-summers-must-have-ankle-boots.html to http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/article/TMG8474134/Step-into-this-summers-must-have-ankle-boots.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20111122/JUICE/311230021/-1/watchdog/Style-Over-knee-not-over-top

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)