Talk:Fat choy
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Fat choy be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in China may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Need traditional characters
editThis article needs the Chinese traditional characters as well. Badagnani 01:40, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
why is this article at "fat choy"?
editThis thing is from northern China and is eaten all over China, not just in Hong Kong. Even the pun ("get rich quick") works in both Mandarin and Cantonese to the same extent (same sound, wrong tone on the second character). So I'm curious why it is at "fat choy" and not, say, the pinyin name or maybe "hair vegetable". --PalaceGuard008 14:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- This is English Wikipedia and that's the name most English-speaking people know this stuff by (if they know it at all), due to the original prevalence of Cantonese immigrants in the English speaking world. Just like we know the "mei" as "ume" or "doufu" as "tofu" because we learned about those things primarily from the Japanese. Badagnani 17:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Is there a reference for "fat choy" being the most common name? A rough google search turns up 933 results for "hair moss" - not exactly a rare usage. (Ed: I realised many of these were referring to the other moss).Most (but not all) results for "facai" are about the new year greeting. In a search for "fat choy" (excluding wikipedia and mirrors), (it seems) all results are about the new year greeting, except for the "Wayne's World" page cited as a source here.Just from that (very rough) search, I don't see a compelling reason why this article should be at "fat choy" rather than, say, hair moss.cf Chinese cabbage, not bok choy. --PalaceGuard008 13:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)A google search for "Nostoc flagelliforme" (excluding Wikipedia and mirrors) yields a variety of common names: e.g.:"In Chinese cuisine, "fat choy" in Cantonese or "fa cai" in Mandarin""Fa Cai (Nostoc flagelliforme) - how to test for fakes" ... "Fa Cai, Fatt Choy, Flah or Nostoc flagelliforme""the local consumption of Nostoc flagelliforme, i.e. hair moss""Nostoc flagelliforme or "fat choy""Personally, I would yield to Martin Lee QC and the Hong Kong LegCo's command of English to place this article at hair moss.As you said, this is the English Wikipedia, but that does not mean it is the American English Wikipedia.--PalaceGuard008 14:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)- After some further online readings, I withdraw my objections - though I still think an English name is preferrable. --PalaceGuard008 14:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's the equivalent of how "bok choy" got into English. I don't think "hair moss" is used much in English and the plant is not really moss. Badagnani 15:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- I was influenced by the naming of Chinese cabbage rather than bok choy. You're right - "hair moss" is not used much in English and it often refers to something else entirely. Fat choy is not nearly as commonplace as Chinese cabbage outside China and Chinese-speaking communities, so it's not surprising that a prevalent English name has not developed. --PalaceGuard008 07:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Additional box
editArticle looks funny with Chinese box and taxobox. IMO this was one where the inline template is probably best, along with the taxobox. Badagnani 06:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fat choy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071122003910/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=37176&sid=11956724&con_type=1 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=37176&sid=11956724&con_type=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fat choy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040201154650/http://sg.bcmagazine.net/cgi-bin/output.cgi?issue=027&&id=14 to http://sg.bcmagazine.net/cgi-bin/output.cgi?issue=027&&id=14
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:32, 28 September 2017 (UTC)