Talk:Fedeleșoiu

Untitled

What use is a disambiguation page for two articles that don't exists? At least one of the articles included must exist, since both do not exist, then there is no point in having this disambiguation page, when one or both articles are created, then the disambiguation page may be added. (Jenova1 21:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC))

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mătăcina bogdan 23:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Villages are inherently notable. Deleting this page would be like deleting a year. - Francis Tyers · 18:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Look you (Bogdangiusca) need to stop making disambig pages for articles thatdo not exist, if you want information on those villages, then make an article, not a disambig page. The point of a disambig page is to seperate two or more articles of the same name, since both do not exist then the disambig page is not serving its purpose. Information is for articles, if you want that information, then make the articles, not a disambig page! {Jenova1 21:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)}

Please read the definition of Patent nonsense. It's supposed to be used for articles that are gibberish. This is not the case. bogdan 21:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

There savy? {Jenova1 22:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)}

It's not a redirect, either. bogdan 10:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Crying out loud. This is absurd. Stop trying to delete this article! - Francis Tyers · 10:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

I'll leave this page alone if either of you can tell me what wiki formated puropose this page is fullfilling. (Jenova1 05:24, 9 December 2006 (UTC))