Talk:Federal courts of Switzerland

Requested move 26 April 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move the article has been established within the RM time period and thus defaulting to not moved. Additionally, the !votes for "oppose" were significantly stronger arguments and thus resulting in a greater consensus on the !votes. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 04:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

---

Federal courts of Switzerland → Judiciary of Switzerland – Standardizing the name of main articles for Category:Judiciaries. This is the one linked for Switzerland. If it describes only a limited part of Swiss judiciary, then the redirect at Judiciary of Switzerland pointing here should be deleted instead. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC) relisted --Mike Cline (talk) 13:49, 4 May 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. Steel1943 (talk) 23:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose ambiguous naming wikt:judiciary means the body of judges. Alternate proposal use Court system of Switzerland instead -- 70.51.46.195 (talk) 12:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
• Support. Standardization seems appropriate. Will need expansion with respect to cantonal judicial systems.  Sandstein  12:24, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
• Support: its actually a rather logical move. "Judiciary" means the entire system, not just judges. Its more succinct and can be made uniform across other nation's judiciary pages. DaltonCastle (talk) 23:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
  • It would be better to choose an unambiguous name which doesn't also mean just the body of judges, and use that instead for uniformity. -- 70.51.200.96 (talk) 06:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
• Strong Oppose – This article covers only the Swiss Federal courts, not the whole judicial system of the country, which includes many diverse cantonal court systems. Swiss cantons are autonomous states and Swiss people are extremely attached to the federal system distributing power bottom-up from individual citizens to the municipal level, then to the canton and finally to the confederation. — JFG ^talk 12:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose as ambiguous, and as an attempt to force American English usage of the word "judiciary" onto the relevant articles. RGloucester — ☎ 15:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose. Federal judiciary of Switzerland (analogous to Federal judiciary of the United States) might be okay, but Judiciary of Switzerland simply isn't an accurate description of the content of this article since the Federal courts encompass only a small portion of the Swiss court system. Dragons flight (talk) 10:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Federal courts of Switzerland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090504114919/http://www.admin.ch/index.html?lang=en to http://www.admin.ch/index.html?lang=en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)