This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
A fact from Feed sack dress appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that an estimated 3 million women and children in the United States were wearing clothing made from feed sacks(example pictured) at any given time during World War II?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Feed sack dress in the collection of the Smithsonian
... that during WWII it was estimated that 3 million US women and children were wearing clothing made from feed sacks(example pictured) at any given point in time? Source: multiple sources at article sentence
GTG, but please make things easier for reviewers in future! Fascinating stuff! New & long enough, seems neutral & well-written. Earwig only finds names & quotes. Pic ok to use, QPQ done. Hook eventually verified, after a good deal of reading - please give quotes in future, which is easily done. I couldn't see it in the very long first ref at the sentence (Vogelsang), so why is that there? Also please specify when you moved it to mainspace so I don't have to look through all the history, but that's now done. Johnbod (talk) 20:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Johnbod, hey, sorry...usually I do link to and quote specific sources, but this one felt like it didn't need it so much. I'll not make that assumption in future, thanks! And thanks for the review! :) --valereee (talk) 20:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
.png)
GTG, but please make things easier for reviewers in future! Fascinating stuff! New & long enough, seems neutral & well-written. Earwig only finds names & quotes. Pic ok to use, QPQ done. Hook eventually verified, after a good deal of reading - please give quotes in future, which is easily done. I couldn't see it in the very long first ref at the sentence (Vogelsang), so why is that there? Also please specify when you moved it to mainspace so I don't have to look through all the history, but that's now done. Johnbod (talk) 20:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)