This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development articles
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
The reference offered by HighKing is not suitable. It is from the website of the organization which is subject of the article. That's not a 3rd party ref, so I'll revert the edit. WoodMuncher (talk) 17:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Your reason for reverting is incorrect. There's no problem with using the reference - see WP:ABOUTSELF. The claim is not unduly self-serving or exceptional, and there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity. Furthermore, your revert is completely unreferenced, not have you provided a reference to back up the claim. If you're going to revert again, I suggest you find a reference for your change. Also, have you edited using a different name in the past? --HighKing (talk) 12:32, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
No, not me. Has yourself ever edited as someone else? So anyway I fixed the reference. It was just about right to start with. The original editor has just placed it in the wrong part of the sentence. As it is, your reference is okay as well. WoodMuncher (talk) 07:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
