Talk:Feedzai
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
REMOVE CONSIDERATION FOR DELETION/COI TAG
editThis edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello,
I recently made several changes to this page on behalf of my employer, Feedzai. I have recently disclosed this conflict of interest in my profile page. It is my intention to provide fair, neutral tone and point of view to the Feedzai page. I welcome any feedback that will improve the quality of my page while meeting Wikipedia's guidelines and standards. Please advise on how I can improve the page - and more importantly, reduce the risk of page deletion.
Thank you for your time! Ssfdz (talk) 18:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Not done: This is the wrong way to contest an deletion. Participate in the discussion instead. ~ Aselestecharge-paritytime 15:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Sources for draft for review
editHello, for the sake of full transparency, I am submitting this draft for review on behalf of my employer, Feedzai, as I have previously disclosed on my User Page.
I am including below a list of references that I’ve identified and believe meet the requirements for establishing notability according to WP:NCORP, which was the concern in March during the discussion.
New coverage that has been published since the last discussion :
- TechCrunch article
- Público article: Público is a very reputable source and is a major source of media in Portugal
- O Jornal Económico: Another major source of media in Portugal
- Another Público article: Note that this one is not about the funding round
- Observador article
Older coverage that I believe was missed during the previous discussion:
- Venture Beat article from 2014: This is a very reputable source and talks about the company in detail
- Forbes (Portugal) article from 2019: This is not a “sites” article and talks about the company in detail
- Wall Street Journal article from 2015: Wall Street Journal is a very reputable source
Please don’t hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you. Ssfdz (talk) 16:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)