Talk:Feiz Mohammad

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Feiz Mohammad is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Religion: Interfaith

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Feiz Mohammad be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Additions

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some significant additions were made to this article. While I respect WP:DBTN, I don't think the changes followed the manual of style, were of a neutral point of view, and were unreferenced. Recurring dreams

Wow. Don't forget the Original Research either. Prester John 03:39, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lacks of balanced data from the point of view of the main character and his associates.

NPOV tag

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Please specify exactly what is NPOV. I will remove the tag unless I know what is being pointed out. SmithBlue (talk) 02:48, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

User 60.49.220.194 on 16:32, 16 September 2007 wrote "Lacks of balanced data from the point of view of the main character and his associates." I am removing the tag as this reason is not a sufficient reason for a NPOV tag - you need to show that there is information published by a reliable source showing a point of view not included in this article. (Click on WP:RS to read about reliable sources.) Otherwise none of your fellow editors or readers can verify the information. SmithBlue (talk) 04:52, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Definitely Wahhabi

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"Educated" in Saudi Arabia. Born in Australia, not Lebanon. One of the better-known Sunni anglophone rabble rousers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.121.88.198 (talk) 07:56, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unclear Sentence

In the documentary, he says of non-Muslims, in his 'Signs of the Hour' speech', in one DVD, Mohammed said that children should be encouraged to become jihadists: "We want to have children and offer them as soldiers defending Islam... Teach them this: there is nothing more beloved to me than wanting to die as a mujahid. Put in their soft, tender hearts the zeal of jihad and a love of martyrdom."

Improper linkage

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

It is completely improper to link Feiz Mohammad to the bombings in any way, shape or form. The other incidents cited on this page involve specific acts by Mohammad that have been offensive, despicable, condemned, etc. There is no evidence at all that Mohammad encouraged the attacks or was involved in any way, shape or form in their planning. Merely having been linked on someone's YouTube channel is one of the flimsiest attempts at guilt by association that I've ever seen. Per the biographies of living persons policy, I am removing the imputation that Mohammad had anything to do with the attacks. polarscribe (talk) 07:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia reportage on what the Australian Attorney General has had to say about Feiz Muhammad, and what Feiz Mohammed has volunteered to say about the Boston Bombing is not remotely guilt by association on the part of Wikipedia. 58.165.90.197 (talk) 08:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Agree with IP ... it is being sorted out. The appropriate material should remain.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Feiz Mohammad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Feiz Mohammad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic