Talk:Felipe Pérez Roque
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
Untitled
editRoque has been considered the most likely successor to Castro following an interm government by Raul Castro (who himself is 75 years old). This page definately needs vast expansion and I am quite willing to participate (see my work in the Ricardo Alarcon page).--Jersey Devil 02:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- Will put more work into this myself, Jersey. Been very busy on other pages lately. --Zleitzen 02:56, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Nicknamed Fax
editA user has taken issue with the insertion of Pérez Roque's nickname, taken from a piece by primary historian of the Cuban revolution, Jon Lee Anderson. I don't view this as POV, I certainly don't view Anderson's piece as POV and think that the statement should stay in. Any detailed piece one reads about Pérez Roque discusses how he is very much Castro's protege. This must be presented somehow.--Zleitzen 05:27, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
February Change
editI took the liberty of updating this page to show that he is the FORMER Foreign Minister, as of today. --Uoregonduckman (talk) 21:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
What about sources that indicate that Roque has abandoned his party? According to the documents in granma.cu it says that he will be faithful to his party and Fidel. I really think this entry needs to be more neutral as well. http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2009/march/juev5/felipe-perez.html
Yes, the wording "resigned from all his party and state positions" gives the impression that he has left the party. That is not the case. His sucessor bruno Rodriguez has stated officially that Perez Roque is still a member of the PCC: http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2009/03/19/index.php?section=mundo&article=030n1mun —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.88.171.35 (talk) 14:35, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
At the time of my edit, it was not yet truely known the reasons for his release. Sorry about that.Uoregonduckman (talk) 09:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Dimision
editHi. Yesterday, the Spanish newspaper El País, published that the Comunist Party of Cuba was showing a video to his members explaining that the dimision of Pérez Roque was motivated for a plausible conection with the Spanish Inteligency Agency (CNI, Centro Nacional de Inteligencia). Here the article. I would update it, but my English is mediocre. --Montgomery (talk) 22:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Felipe Pérez Roque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060622202432/http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2004/septiembre/lun27/40felipe.html to http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2004/septiembre/lun27/40felipe.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312031831/http://www.cubanet.org/CNews/y01/mar01/02e6.htm to http://www.cubanet.org/CNews/y01/mar01/02e6.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 27 December 2017 (UTC)