Talk:PewDiePie
(Redirected from Talk:Felix Kjellberg)
Latest comment: 22 days ago by Kingsmasher678 in topic "September 2017 bridge incident" listed at Redirects for discussion
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the PewDiePie article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "PewDiePie" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| PewDiePie has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Proposal for Redirect : Pewds to PewDiePie
editHi everyone,
I would like to propose that the term "Pewds" be redirected to the PewDiePie Wikipedia page. "Pewds" is a widely recognized nickname for PewDiePie, and redirecting it would help users find the page more easily.
Thank you for considering this suggestion.
Best regards, 180.149.232.102 (talk) 13:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @180.149.232.102 Hi guys. This is me. When I create this talk page, I don’t' noticed I was log Out BangladeshiStranger🇧🇩 (talk) 08:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- You might want to ask an admin to help you delete the message since your IP address will be visible publicly. TylerBurden (talk) 15:11, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
is he the third most subscribed YouTube channel I know T series is the second and Mr beast is the first
editIdk A Description 2600:8807:1D03:A500:1D08:5CC2:D2C9:5072 (talk) 11:54, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- He is 8th (see List of most-subscribed YouTube channels). Soulbust (talk) 14:47, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
E;R Promotion
editKjellberg promoted YouTuber E;R, a content creator who included a Hitler speech in one of his videos. E;R himself is a self-admitted Anti-Semitic nazi, writing on his Gab account, when another user asked him, “What is the best way to red pill people on the Jewish Question,” the owner of the E;R channel responded, “Pretend to joke about it until the punchline /really/ lands.” Should he be referred to as a Alt-right Nazi/definitive anti-semite on this page? JPHC2003 (talk) 06:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- E;R was a relatively small moment in PDP's career (I will state that that is my opinion and I'm saying it with the benefit of retrospect, I'm saying it's small in the sense that it really just came and went, especially and relative to the other controversies PDP is associated with) so I think it would be undue to include more than the gist of the situation i.e. PDP recommending small creators to his viewerss, with one said creator being E;R and PDP garnering criticism because of the content in E;R's videos (of which it would be important to include PDP stating he was largely unaware of E;R's other videos), and then PDP removing the reference to E;R from the recommendation video. This is why I'm removing the information of the Steven Universe-related video that E;R made, as it really doesn't have anything to do with PewDiePie and his recommendation of the Death Note video. Referencing The Verge's noting of the situation in the text already incorporates the information about E;R's content being what it is. IMO, we don't need the extra Rebecca Sugar/Steven Universe content. That would be more befitting or relevant to include on an E;R article if that were ever to be made. Or perhaps if used as an example on an article discussing problematic/censored content on YouTube.
- As far as referring to the individual creator as such, then no. Unless there are ample amounts of sources referring to him as such. But even then we would have to word it in context, i.e. "E;R has been described as [insert adjective here] by [insert sources here]". It would be better to just refer/describe his content as per the sourcing. Soulbust (talk) 18:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- No, because this article is about PewDiePie, not "E;R".
- See also WP:DUE. TylerBurden (talk) 20:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
The redirect September 2017 bridge incident has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 20 § September 2017 bridge incident until a consensus is reached. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 06:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)