Talk:Feltus Taylor
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NPOV.
editPlease add this to the line - Ponsano expressed her opposition to rehiring Taylor, and Clark agreed.
Donna Ponsano's actual words were , "you're not gonna give him his job back, are you"?
Geeric This article heavily leans toward the description of Taylor as a murderer, without describing any of the events of the trial, such as the witholding of information. Nor does the phrase "American killer" seem NPOV, although I admit that the terminology is debatable.
As I'm related to one of Taylor's defense attorneys, I do not think I can write a NPOV article on this. However, the following facts need to be stated:
During Mr. Taylor's trial he was misadministered a medication which he had to take for a psychotic disorder.
During the sentencing phase of his trial Mr.Taylor had a violent outburst during which he turned over the counsel table in the court room. This happened in full view of the jury.
Mr. Taylor's attorney was not even aware that his client took medication for such a disorder.
More pertinent information can be found at http://www.clarkprosecutor.org/html/death/US/taylor640.htm .
As I said, I question my ability to write a NPOV article. However, the whole truth needs to be presented. GenericGabriel 23:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- This information in the article was taken directly out of the Louisiana Supreme Court case affiriming Taylor's conviction and sentence. The link posted by you contans manly newspaper articles. It is important not to confuse arguements made by Taylor's attorney's as fact. Some of the allegations you mention above were rejected by Louisiana courts as unfactual. I admit that some of the language sould be cleaned up and I am trying different language in some of my newer articles. Howver, I question how you can put a NPOV tag on the article while stating that you do not think you can be NPOV on the subject? Nolamgm 04:04, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- I believe that the article does not fully represent the case, i.e. his defense. The language of the article focuses almost wholly on the crime, whereas the case itself, which had many and varied complications, gets three sentences. I'm not saying that he should be portrayed as innocent; I merely think critical facts are left out. The medication issues mentioned above were rejected not because the courts thought they were untrue but because the courts did not believe that it had a substantial effect. Regardless, it was a large part of the case, and I'd be happy with the article merely mentioning that there was a controversy over it. GenericGabriel 23:50, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- I think you should feel free to add these facts. With what I do for a living, it could be argued that I can't write a NPOV article on capital punishment either. As long as you have a verifiable source for your information, add it. If we work together we can probably greatly improve the article. Or at the very least keep each other honest. Nolamgm 02:50, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
- Great to hear. I'll add as soon as I have time to find citations. Thanks for being understanding. GenericGabriel 03:22, 26 March 2006 (U
Biography for living person notable for one event
editThis article is a biography for a living person who is notable for one event. Guideline WP:BIO1E advises that as a general rule such articles should cover the event, not the person. When writing about criminal acts, having distinct biographies of victims or perpetrators that are separate from the article about the crime is normally only necessary if the crime is a notable historic event and the person's role is significant or they are separately notable for other reasons. In this article, once the crime and its consequential sentence and execution are given due weight, there is almost nothing else left to write a biography about. Since the crime totally outweighs any other aspect of the biography, about the only thing that suggests this is a biography is the title and one sentence in the lead section. In reality, this article is a coat rack article about a murder that is disguised as a biography. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 08:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)