Talk:Feminist art movement

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lukedanielowens.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 19 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bjlittleben.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Feminist art movement stub

I created this stub with a definition of the feminist art movement because all Feminist art movement links redirected to Feminist art movement in the United States.--CaroleHenson (talk) 04:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

So... this is the reason 'feminist art' and 'feminist art movement' are two pages on the English Wikipedia.

I'd argue to merge them. JackTheSecond (talk) 21:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Feminist art movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140317230302/http://www.seattleartmuseum.org/elles/elles_pompidou.html to http://seattleartmuseum.org/elles/elles_pompidou.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Women's, Gender and Sexuality Studies-17

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 February 2023 and 19 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kkwon02, Gkkim16 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jyallen (talk) 19:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

proposing merge of Feminist art into Feminist art movement

Hey there, I am pretty new to editing and have found the article on Feminist art in the list of those needing copy-edits. To me that page looks very much synonymous to the one on the Feminist art movement - it is in fact synonymous in several other languages.

To go about doing that I propose merging the former (Feminist art) into the latter mainly because the one called Feminist art is written decently less well.

My solution would include adding a redirect from 'feminist art', obviously. JackTheSecond (talk) 22:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Oppose, and leave separate. Both articles are full encyclopedic articles, with varying sources focusing on two different topics. Feminist art is mainly about the art of the 1970s, when feminism in art evolved and took a stand. The other is an overview of the topic over many decades. These pages are both needed to inform about the topics. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Comment. That just means that the article 'Feminist Art' is less complete. Which is the more reasonable conclusion in my view, seeing how it is substandard. JackTheSecond (talk) 13:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Oppose. This article needs a great deal of work but I believe that it helps to deefine the greater meaning of Feminist Art, separate from the movement in the 1960s. I would agree with shortening this article to focus more on the artists and less on the history of the movement Variety312 (talk) 20:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Additional arguments:

• No other art movement has more than one page dedicated to it.
• It is actually quite difficult, even pointless, to write differing lead sections.
• There is nothing in the article 'feminist art' that isn't already in the other.
• An extensive study on individual works should be moved to their own pages, as stubs if necessary.

JackTheSecond (talk) 01:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

One more argument I forgot about: This article was created not for content reasons, but because redirect pages for 'feminist art movement' would go to 'Feminist art movement in the United States' - see the talk page discussion up above. (here) JackTheSecond (talk) 13:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Support merge proposal; overlap. The lede at Feminist art claims that the focus is on late 1960s and 1970s, but the contents extends to the 1990s. The restriction to 60s and 70s is unreferenced and unwarranted POV. Hence, merge for overlap. Klbrain (talk) 09:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

• Support. As far as I can tell, there is no compelling page size reason to separate the movement in the 1970s (if it even exists; it doesn't seem to me that it is as distinct as people above claim), and I don't see how an article about that movement could be written without either duplicating much of, or requiring the reader to also read, the parent article about feminist art. So this meets criteria #2 and #5 of WP:MERGEREASON, and I'm not seeing any arguments that merging would in any way negatively impact the reader. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)