Talk:Feminist language reform

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment in Spring 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nazarian17.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 August 2020 and 23 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cdowney44.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 22 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Skmpark. Peer reviewers: Nish0912, Andreaplascencia.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled

Information being considered for this article - Gendered pronouns and meaning - https://www.jstor.org/stable/42887784?seq=1#references_tab_contents

Grammar and gender - https://www.jstor.org/stable/43103759

Women's representation - https://books.google.com/books?id=cM-wCwAAQBAJ&lpg=PR6&ots=f8HGsNXh8r&dq=feminism%20and%20linguistic%20theory&lr&pg=PA6#v=onepage&q=feminism%20and%20linguistic%20theory&f=false —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdowney44 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Critisism

I feel this needs a criticism section. I can try to find sources later — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:1D5:EF:2:0:0:0:61 (talk) 18:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Needs discussion of recent additions to well known dictionaries from feminism

"mansplain", example of a negative word describing men which comes from feminism. — 2600:1700:d591:5f10:74e0:c0d2:5220:74ad (talk) 04:23, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Peer Review

This article “Feminist Language Reform” is rated as a Start Class article, a preliminary article with plenty of room for improvement, with a completeness score of 61, a rating that I agree with. Some strengths of this article are that it provides a great introduction into the realm of Feminist language and the reform surrounding it. This article does a great job at providing a sufficient history of language reform with a few country specific examples to really drive the point home. It also explains the theory of feminist language planning in a concise and easy to understand manner. One way this article could be improved is to maybe add more for the implementation section. It may be helpful to provide examples for each of the four stages of feminist language planning or to provide an example of one aspect of feminist language planning that has gone through all four steps. There is also a lot of text in each section, so it may be useful to place more pictures throughout the article in order to break up the long paragraphs. Overall, I believe that article can classified as very close to being completely well-developed due to its strong base and thoroughly fleshed out examples. Hope this was helpful & good luck! — Nish0912 (talk) 04:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

links

• https://changingminds.org/explanations/gender/womens_language.htm — a linguistic theory reaction? in which direction?
• https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-language

— Arlo James Barnes 05:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)