Talk:Fencing response

Image

There was an animated image of this occurring in a MMA fight on the front page of reddit, I'm not sure how it would work with rights or if it's relevant to the article. http://i.imgur.com/Msyze.gif — Preceding unsigned comment added by IEchuu (talk • contribs) 11:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

even if the link wasn't making a masturbation joke, it really isn't a good example of classic fencing response hand positioning.  — Chris Capoccia 💬 13:03, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fencing response. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110707144746/http://annistonstar.com/bookmark/10112928-Helmet-to-helmet-hits-on-a-fine-line-of-violence-but-Saban-teaching-proper-tackling-techniques to http://annistonstar.com/bookmark/10112928-Helmet-to-helmet-hits-on-a-fine-line-of-violence-but-Saban-teaching-proper-tackling-techniques

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Categorization

Would it be appropriate to put this in Category:Reflexes ? Gilded Snail (talk) 18:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

I don't think there are any reliable sources calling it a reflex.  — Chris Capoccia 💬 13:01, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Notable fencing displays

I don't think we need 100 of these examples. It's a common enough occurrence in contact sport. Can we pick maybe 1 from each sport or something?  — Chris Capoccia 💬 13:01, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Budda Baker - January 2022 Fencing Response vs Rams

This needs to be added. 2600:1700:AA98:4010:C83A:64F5:3B78:BA88 (talk) 08:07, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Notable fencing displays

Many of the entires in the list are unsourced. It needs to be pared down anyway, because Wikipedia is not an exhaustive collection of information. Listing examples with no context is not encyclopedically valuable. I am going to go ahead and remove unsourced examples, and I am open to discussion about the others. TNstingray (talk) 13:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

I don’t believe this section belongs in Wikipedia at all, certainly not without WP:MEDRS-level sourcing by treating physicians. As it stands, it’s a compilation of YouTube videos of injured people with no encyclopedic sources to support relevance. Julietdeltalima (talk) 04:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

I have deleted almost the whole section. I’ve done this one entry at a time so there can be individual discussion if anybody actually thinks they have an argument for preservation. I left in entries sourced only behind a paywall (who knows; maybe the Telegraph’s sports editor is a board-certified neurologist who underwent a big career change) and a couple of entries in which the source acknowledged that they were only reporting on witnessed physical events.

I frankly think none of these ought to survive and will not oppose their deletion, but I am pretty sure if I had deleted the whole section it would lead to reversion and abuse, and I wanted to try to provide a basis for some level of discussion to demonstrate I’m not “just some female who hates sports,” which is far from the truth (and abjectly irrelevant in a WP:MEDRS context) but I know how these things can play out. Julietdeltalima (talk) 05:21, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your revisions. I definitely agree with your stance, and I would vote in favor of removing the entire section at this point, until reliable medical sources are provided. TNstingray (talk) 12:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

List

I have tagged the article as needing cleanup, and will be doing so myself this weekend, in line with WP:OR, I'll be cleaning up to remove any supposed fencing response that does not have an article discussing the response, as simply linking to the video doesn't meet notability or verifiability guidelines. FrederalBacon (talk) 06:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Overview

Is the fencing response really "'used as' an overt indicator" as opposed to 'observed as' or 'considered to be'? "Used" definitely seems to be the wrong term to "use" here in my opinion. Authun (talk) 23:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)