Talk:Fenerbahçe S.K. (football)

Latest comment: 3 hours ago by 83.9.116.38 in topic Image overcrowdedness and edit warring
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 7, 2018Featured article candidateNot promoted

This article is about the football team

edit

Dear editors, please note that this article is about only the football part of Fenerbahçe S.K.. The multisport club is detailed at Fenerbahçe S.K.. I have had to repeatedly remove info that is not about the football side of the club, as well as a load of unreferenced POV and copyvio. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 12:40, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Rivalry with Trabzonspor

edit

There should be something about the rivalry with Trabzonspor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2ulus (talkcontribs) 23:17, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Fenerbahçe S.K. (football). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:48, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fenerbahçe S.K. (football). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Bloody shame

edit

It's a bloody shame somebody decided to take down the whole article including the images, it took me weeks to edit this article and it seems that nothing is being done about it. Redman19 (talk) 10:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Fenerbahçe S.K. (football). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fenerbahçe S.K. which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 02:00, 9 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:53, 14 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Page locked

edit

@Dgagonofeast and Fatihoztrk950: I have locked the page for two days so that you two can stop edit warring and discuss your differences. Please explain to each other why you are making the edits you are. -- MelanieN (talk) 19:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Dragonofeast: Sorry, I messed up the ping. -- MelanieN (talk) 19:55, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Fatihoztrk950: The current template has been used for years. There is an error in the information given in the new arrangement. I recommend that an author who is more familiar with this subject should make an arrangement. -- User:Fatihoztrk950 (talk) 04:33, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:37, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:36, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

The championships

edit

The fact the championships are listed on here as “28 (record)” is interesting to say the least, Beşiktaş and Galatasaray both do not have the championships listed as such nor do they include the pre-Süper Lig titles (In both cases they are listed separately). Why is it that on this page specifically its listed as such?

Also the mention of the record 28 titles (which up until my edit was unsourced and appears to be sourced directly from Fenerbahçe’s website) indicates a possible conflict of interest.

I should clarify I am only curious about why its like this on this page, apologies if I didn’t make that clear. SignedInteger (talk) 18:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 27 May 2024

edit

They do NOT have the record of most titles. That record belongs to Galatasaray with 24. 75.204.130.124 (talk) 17:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 23:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Team image

edit

The licence for the team image on Wikimedia Commons used by the Fenerbahçe S.K. (football) page has expired in recent months. Although I tried to correspond with the club about this issue, unfortunately I did not receive any feedback. The page was left without an image because of the inability to upload unauthorised files to Commons. I need your help regarding this issue. Thank you for your help. Fatihoztrk950 (talk) 16:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

You can take me in your team

edit

Position :LW,CB 58.145.190.233 (talk) 15:59, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

You can take me in your team

edit

Name sujoy Chakma What's app 01601079525 58.145.190.233 (talk) 16:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Image overcrowdedness and edit warring

edit

I believe I have to give a proper warning before seeking additional help regarding this issue. I see that an user (@Semih1994) is actively turning a blind eye on Wiki guidelines such as; MOS:SANDWICH, MOS:ACCIM, Wikipedia:When to use or avoid "other stuff exists" arguments and actively engaging in non-productive methods like WP:EW, WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT. Please be complaint with the rules. 83.9.116.38 (talk) 17:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

You are constantly disrupting the layout of the page. You are evaluating it with the screen you see by connecting from a computer. The Fenerbahçe article has been the same on Wikipedia for years. These edits have no meaning and do not contribute anything. They are also not suitable for the content. Semih1994 (talk) 09:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the main layout medium of Wikipedia pages is actually 'computer' based. These edits are clearly in compliance with the above-mentioned guidelines. Your actions lack constructive behavior. Please be mindful of the editing principles. Statements such as "The Fenerbahçe article has been the same on Wikipedia for years." do not apply to Wikipedia since the main philosophy of being an open encyclopedia is to have an ever changing and growing content throughout time. As I've mentioned previously on the edit history; if you do keep up this non-cooperative behavior, I'll be seeking further help and intervention. 83.9.116.38 (talk) 19:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

You can apply wherever you want. You are not contributing to Wikipedia by constantly editing multiple articles negatively and corrupting their content without making a meaningful contribution through an anonymous user account. I will continue to make the necessary edits until you realize this. Semih1994 (talk) 20:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Again and again, you lack both manners and knowledge about very fundamental guidelines such as WP:POLEMIC. Our edit history and even this talkpage section is more than enough for proving your hostility. Also, I'm surprised that you just could not figure out the fact that I actually 'am' a non-anon wiki editor but not using my account for this time. 83.9.116.38 (talk) 17:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply