Talk:Fennemore Craig
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fennemore Craig article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Fennemore Craig appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 February 2009, and was viewed approximately 805 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contesting speedy deletion
editThis is an entry for one of the top law firms in the country. I saw a glaring omission in NOT having this lawfirm on Wikipedia, as it is one of the largest in the country as seen here at number 220: List of largest U.S. law firms by number of lawyers. I am still in the process of trying to make it 'not spammy' so that it does not appear to be an advertisement. I will link it to more topics in Wikipedia to make it known that this is not spam.
This law firm is where the husband of Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor used to practice law.
Several Law firms of this size are already in Wikipedia. In creating this entry, those entries were used as benchmarks.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Bfeddern (talk • contribs) 00:29, 10 February 2009 UTC
- I've rewritten the article in a neutral point of view so it won't be deleted now. I've also nominated it for DYK. Cunard (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Fennemore Craig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fclaw.com/practices/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202425874104
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221075103/http://www.fclaw.com/News/Materials/PRESS%20RELEASE%20-%20Best%20Lawyers%20Corporate%20v2.pdf to http://www.fclaw.com/News/Materials/PRESS%20RELEASE%20-%20Best%20Lawyers%20Corporate%20v2.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120814235231/http://www.fclaw.com/news/Materials/Benchmark's%20Top%20250%20Women%20in%20Litigation%20Press%20Release%202012%20-%20FINAL%20DRAFT%20071812.pdf to http://www.fclaw.com/news/Materials/Benchmark%27s%20Top%20250%20Women%20in%20Litigation%20Press%20Release%202012%20-%20FINAL%20DRAFT%20071812.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bestcompaniesaz.com/best-places-to-work-az-archives-2007.asp
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bestlawyers.com/search/firmProfile.aspx?firm_ID=11125
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.azcentral.com/business/abg/articles/2008/07/03/20080703abg-lawrail0703.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fclaw.com/news/Materials/2008%20Mountain%20States%20Super%20Lawyers%20press%20release.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)