Wikipedia

Talk:Fenwick High School (Oak Park, Illinois)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Meters in topic alumni again
Learn more about this page

Fenwick

edit

Why does the title indicate that Fenwick is located in Chicago? Oak Park is a suburb outside of the city. Also, the St. Ignatius-Fenwick rivalry is highly exaggerated, comparing it to Andover-Exeter. Oak Park and River Forest-Fenwick is probably bigger and it still is not as intense as PA-PE.

Puff-piece

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This puff-piece, totally devoid of primary sources, has been put together by anonymous IPs who don't respond to warnings, several of which have been issued by myself and other editors. Every day it reads more like an ad, and I would encourage anyone who has a little time on their hands to spend it cleaning this mess up. I gave it a bit of a try, but couldn't verify almost any of it anywhere except on the school's own site, and even if I accepted all of that as fact, there were still claims (only HS in the US owned by the Dominican Order, for example) that not even the school's site reflected. (added by Poindexter Propellerhead | Talk at 17:16, May 27, 2007)

We're getting some sources and adding cites now. This will help tone down the PR flavor to it.
—  Jim Dunning  talk  :  20:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fenwick sourcing

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

One of the areas we're working on is to verify much of the information in the article and provide verifiable references. Most of the "facts" in the article have no sources attached to them and will be deleted soon if none can be found and added; this will effectively gut the article. We alert interested editors to this need (and danger) with maintenance tags, such as {{Fact}}, {{cn}} and {{Primarysources|date=May 2007}}. However, one or two editors have been routinely removing them without making improvements to the sources issue (and have also been adding more "facts" without sources, thus adding to the problem). Two things happen as a result: (1) interested editors are not alerted as quickly to the important work to be done, and (2) readers are not alerted that the "facts" they are reading have not been vetted and may not be accurate. We certainly appreciate the interest these editors have in improving this article and hope they continue to contribute, but please do not remove maintenance tags without first completely resolving the issue in question.
—  Jim Dunning  talk  :  21:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

By the way, some may think I went a bit overboard with the {{Fact}} tags, but I want to prove a point about how much of the article is unsourced.
—  Jim Dunning  talk  :  22:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Message to IP 65.54.15x.xx editor

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This is for the anonymous user whose IP address begins with 65.54.15x.xx. I understand your edits are in good faith, and thank you for your interest in improving this article and others. If you take the following steps you may find your WP experience more satisfying and productive (I'm leaving this information here because you appear to log in from slightly different IPs each time, which is normal for someone without a fixed IP address).

  • I noticed you are known only as an IP address (maybe you login in from school/work?); that means you are not signed up. To sign up, you only need to click Create account and choose a username and password. You don't need to provide any personal information. If you sign up, you'll have a username that is unique that others can use to recognize you and leave you messages on your Talk page. You'll be able to sign your name just by typing four tildes (~~~~) when you leave someone else a message. Plus, you (and others) will easily be able to see a list of all your contributions to Wikipedia.
  • Take a look at Citation templates for information on how to format citations of sources. You may also find Footnotes especially helpful, since this is the area you were asking assistance on. This article discusses how to format citations for footnotes using the <ref> . . . </ref> tags to enclose a citation. More to the point on what you were trying to do, you can repeat a footnote reference to an existing cite by naming it (<ref name="name"> . . . </ref>) the first time you use it, and then reference it without using the citation detail just by using <ref name="name"/>. The neat thing about this is that you don't have to worry about the footnote numbering (or re-numbering when new citations are added), because the <references/> tag at the end of the article does all that for you.
  • Finally, please use Edit Summaries when you make changes. It helps you and others quickly identify what revision has been made. Many times an editor will not be able to understand the change made to an article if the Edit Summary is blank, believe the change to be Vandalism, and revert your change. WP does not require use of Summaries, but it is considered good etiquette (besides being very helpful to other editors).

If you have any questions, see the help pages, ask at the Village pump, or feel free to ask me on my Talk page. Have fun!
—  Jim Dunning  talk  :  12:17, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Dunning for the info on citations, I will look that over and place them correctley. I also made some minor adjustments to the wording on their admission test and water polo achievments. I have been basing my facts on The Harlem and Irving Times Newspaper which is part of Pioneer Press in Oak Park Illinois. The paper has a section just on local schools which can even be gotten through their website. However, if you do a search on Fenwick at the moment, nothing pops up becuse they only list their current stories for the week- and there happens to be nothing on Fenwick right now. However, they do have a school record database that can be searched for past stories that lists everything. You can also do a search right now in the "Photo Store" section where there are many images of Fenwick athletic achievements that were shot for the articles over the years.
Just a few words on why Fenwick's page needs to be up to snuff. There is a movement with Chicago's two top schools, Fenwick and St. Ignatius, to become America's leaders in educataion. Both schools have their eye on toppling the big two of the East (Andover and Exeter), and we are seeing a rather unique development by these two Chicago Schools. Ivies are heavily recruiting from them and Fenwick is an absolute powerhouse with their extracurricular achievment. Ignatius had more students going to Georgetown than even Andover, a far larger school. We are also seeing a movement of Protestant and Jewish faith based students also enrolling in Fenwick and Ignatius who were traditionally catholic based schools in the past.
While I agree, that the listing does seem slightly puff-like, it is important that all those archievments are listed, because they are true, but more importantly, it does make searchers aware that both of these two schools need to be taken very seriously. We may have a new movement occuring in the U.S. that is suggesting that America's leadership is not really coming from the eastern establishment any more. these guy with their midwest discipline end up become high power CEO's. Many of even Hollywood's players, if you check, have their roots in Chicago. So please bear with me on the editing of Fenwick's listing, it is not to be an ad nor is it to be inaccurate in the school's achievment—Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.142.117.238 (talk • contribs) 13:01, June 9, 2007
This is an encyclopedia article, not a website for the institution. Material in this article needs to be notable and supported by references. We welcome your contributions but please don't mistake this article for an advertising or recruiting venue for the school. --ElKevbo 18:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

It is verifiable by the newspaper (a secondary source unconnected with the school), I have no interest in people going to Fenwick or even liking the school, I did not go there, nor am I linked to them now, but the listing has to be accurate in what the school is for people researching it. I'm sorry in using the word "website"- poor word choice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.142.117.238 (talk • contribs) 18:50, June 9, 2007

may want to correct the problem with duplication on the bottom of referces that resulted when trying to add the missing citations for 17 and 18. Both of those citations are coming from (Long, Dan)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.54.154.151 (talk • contribs) 11:35, June 10, 2007

The problem that you just introduced yourself? Wouldn't it be easier to NOT INTRODUCE PROBLEMS and ask for help here first? --ElKevbo 16:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yearbook award

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

I am unable to find a source to support the statement, "The Blackfriars Yearbook has just received a 1st place award from the American Scholastic Press." ASPA's own website, which lists this year's (and past years') awards, does not support this. Can anyone provide relevant information on this (hopefully in the form of a link to a website)? Otherwise the statement must be removed.
—  Jim Dunning  talk  :  21:25, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Oak Park newspaper printed that the school has won 8 Gallery of Excellence Awards from Walsworth Publishing Company for the Balckfriars Yearbook. It was the Wick (school newspaper) that just recieved a 1st place STANDING from the American Scholastic Press. I went into Fenwick's website, it is also stated there as well- go into "students", then go into "clubs & organizations" and open up "the Blackfriars Yearbook" and "the Wick". The school will reinterate what the Oak Park paper has also printed.

I went into the ASPA's website, it does list "Touchstone" which is a magazine that Fenwick puts out in unison with their yearbook (the two together) that did win an award.

I appreciate the additional information you (65.54.154.24, 65.54.154.151, 65.54.154.25, 65.54.98.102, 65.54.154.46 or whichever IP address you are today) have been providing, but you need to do two things before attempting to contribute anything else to this or any other article (please): (1) go to and study the Wikipedia Help sections and tutorials, especially Contents/Editing Wikipedia, Contents/Links, Contents/Policies and guidelines, Citing sources and Talk page guidelines; and (2) Please set up a username so we can communicate with you better. Click on Create account and choose a username and password. Right now every time you make an edit you show up as a different IP address. If you plan to continue to edit WP, then please set up a username. Ideally, I should not be leaving this message for you here, but on your very own Talk page.
I have removed all of the Long and Wagner references because they do not provide enough information about the sources for the statements you and others have placed in the article. A citation should adequately identify a source so a reader can locate that source to verify the accuracy of the referenced information. "Long, Dan (2007). Edison Norwood Times Review. Pioneer Press" and "Wagner, Nicole (2007). Pioneer Local School Review" do not provide enough information. If you are referencing hardcopy newspapers, then you should have the issue date and page numbers (in addition to the author and newspaper name) available to you. If so, then please add them to the citation when you replace it. If you are working off the newspaper's website, there may not be a page number, but there certainly is a web page URL you must include in the citation. Providing this level of detail assists both the reader (verifiable sources) and all editors (who can use the links to update information down the road as the awards and statistics change. Again, just providing a general reference to a newspaper is insufficient (especially since you appear to have access to the desired information).
Consider using Wikipedia's inline citation templates for the footnotes; this will make formatting easier and ensure the necessary information is included. Click on the Edit tab of the article and see how others have formatted the footnote references. For example, here's a complete reference to your favorite newspaper — <ref>{{cite news | last = Stablein | first = Tim | coauthors = | title = Friars make quick work of Shamrocks | work = | pages = | language = | publisher = OakPark-Leaves.com (Sun-Times News Group) | date = May 16, 2007 | url = http://www.pioneerlocal.com/oakpark/sports/386513,op-fenbwpl-051607-s1.article | accessdate = 2007-06-09}}</ref>. Also, try not to use the school's own publications and website as a significant source of information; to maintain objectivity (WP:NPOV) and verifiability, try to focus on third-party sources unless absolutely unavoidable. That's why I'm relying on the ASPA website for the publishing awards: I'm not saying that what you've added about first place awards isn't true, but it needs to be verifiable. Similarly, for the yearbook awards, locate a source other than the school website to verify the awards. Try the Walsworth website, or if you have the specific webpage for the newspaper article, use that.
I'd be glad to help you with this, so don't hesitate to ask for help on my Talk page anytime after you've set up a username, and I will respond on your Talk page (and make sure you sign your Talk page entries). I'm looking forward to working with you further on this article. My apologies to other editors for placing this message on the article's Talk page.
—  Jim Dunning  talk  :  03:29, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

You know what, I will not spend any more time with this. I have been researching this school more than any one else. The information that I have provided has been accurate. If you go into the IHSA website, you will find under schools that you can get to a Fenwick listing and there is a yahoo map that clearly will show the school on Washingtonm Blvd. and the Priory on Division St. You can do a basic web search right now on the the school's architect which will lead you to the gothic church the architect designed for Notre Dame University. I have provided you with the data base that has all of the articles listed about the school with Pioneer- which was completely removed. It is no mystery that a Blackfriar is for the Dominican Order- it is even listed right there on their yearbook. And I appreciate you not wanting to use primary sources, but come on, it's not like the shool made up it's 1929 yearbook that has a picture of the building of the school as well as information about the architect who designed it, which is all available on their website.You can point out that the information is coming from a primary source, and researchers who are looking at Fenwick's page will take that into account. It doesn't mean that just because something may be coming from the schools website, that it is wrong or still not of value. There is a substantial level of credibility to any reputable high school or university's website. Before I got to Fenwick's listing, one would have not even recognized it as the school we are writing about now, and I just figured that could do a public service by improving the page. The listing you have for Fenwick as it is is 100% accurate witha a ton of other substantial portions missing, like their very exclusive alumni club that hosts a very important ball at the Cadilac Club of the Chicago Bears, or the school's very impressive chapel that was designed after the Blackfriars church in London with stain glass made by a Vatican artist, There is also a Fenwick Hall of Fame, and so on. But I will leave Wikipedia in your hands from now on.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.54.98.28 (talk • contribs) 04:54, June 12, 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry to see you go and will miss your interest and energy. Please understand that my requests and suggestions regarding cite formatting and reviewing Help topics before further editing were put forward to improve your Wiki experience. They were not meant as negative criticism. I hope you return to WP and continue to work on improving articles. Always feel free to ask me for help on my Talk page after you get a Username so I know who you are.
—  Jim Dunning  talk  :  11:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fenwick Sourcing

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I am interested in sending my son to a top school in the Chicago area and have been researching schools. I noticed that Wikipedia's page for Fenwick has citations missing and looked into matters for myself to have justification. Fenwick, St. Ignatius, and Loyola Academy have the reputation of being the best perp. schools in the Chicago area and all are similar in tuition costs, making a choice for me a difficult one. I contacted Cheryl Harbour of the school who was able to provide justification of these claims that I saw on Wikipedia, and I received information from the National Merit Scholarship Corporation that has a profile of the school. Dr. Plass of the American Scholastic Press also wrote a profile of the school as well, and those points, formally needing citations, were verified. I thought that I should cite them for those, like myself, trying to make a hard choice. I was also referred to the Directory of Private Schools that lists Fenwick's and Ignatius' ACT testing scores, which are both similar at about 27 (Fenwick's specifically 26.5). Fenwick and Ignatius listing comes in neck and neck scholastically and are listed as the two best prep schools in Chicago, Loyola is a little farther behind. Fenwick is leaps and bound greater in athletics, compare to the other two schools. Fenwick and Ignatius are big rivals- loyola to a lesser extent, much like Andover and Exter as listed. Fenwick calls Ignatius "Iggy" to make fun of them and Ignatius call Fenwick the "dungeon" because of it's gothic school and black school colors. Also, because Ignatius is a far more beautiful campus as well. The school of Fenwick though is a beautiful gothic structure and was created in 1929 by the architect listed. Fenwick has a 1929 record of the architect on file- it can be checked, but I really didn't wory about that too much- it's not my primary concern of making a choice between Fenwick and Ignatius. The citations I listed should be put back for people trying to choose like I am. I will return the previous page. It is verified and accurate. The other uncited sources also seem to be correct- like their fight song being inspired from Yale's, but I don't have sources for that, and I don't really care to even look into that, again it's not important from my perspective. You may also want to check the web page of American Scholastic Press, Fenwick's magazine (Touchstone) is listed as an award winner. Thanks

  • Follow Up: Your two sections needing sources, the "ACT" part and the "two top schools" would also be covered by the sources I listed in the above statement, but I leave that up to you to cite. I think it would be benificial to be done as well. Thank you again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.54.154.144 (talk • contribs) 10:56, July 1, 2007
Glad to have someone else working on this article and focused on obtaining reliable sources. The American Scholastic Press Association source you mention, is it published somewhere? I couldn't find it online. Your description almost makes it sound like it was a communication between you and Mr. Plass. If the profile is published, it would be great if we could provide more specific information on where it can be found.
Also, I had rearranged the yearbook-newspaper-magazine information to consolidate it all into one place, rather than breaking it up into duplicative pieces in two paragraphs. I further removed the references to first place awards for those publications because the website of the organization making the awards states that they are for second place, not first. I'm not questioning that the information you received from NMSC says "first place", but I'll put more weight on the word of the primary source over that of a secondary source. Finally, can you point us more specifically to the "Directory of Private Schools" you mentioned? I searched for it and came up with far too many hits to identify the one to which you refer. It sounds like a great source for this article, so it would be nice if we could use it.
Thanks for the help. I'm looking forward to improving this article further.
Jim Dunning | talk 18:23, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Yes, hi again, sorry I didn't respond right away, I called a friend of mine that has their son attending Fenwick right now for some follow up information. First off, to answer your previous question: the source from Dr. Plass is an official pamplet type document/report that that agency puts together for the school in order for that school to know where they stand in relation to other schools. So, for example [ I'm looking at the copy I made at that time] Fenwick and Ignatious are head to head Act wise Ignatious at 26.8, Fenwick 26.5, also both schools have very high numbers matriculating to Ivy/top tier schools. Ignatious has the largest matriculation to Georgetown in comparision to any schools in the country. The phamphlet is available to anyone that goes to the school to research information, and it is not published by the school, it is published by Dr. Plass who has no relationship to the school what so ever- so it is objectuive. Fenwick and Ignatious come in as the 2 top ranked private prep schools in the Chicago area according to Dr. Plass with Loyola Academy in there too, but slighly behind. So, whomever wrote that portion for Fenwick's page was knowledgable and accurate, and it would be fair to cite those portions.

The Directory of Private Schools is by Bunting and Lyon and it it also in accordance with many of the things that Dr. Plass wrote such as test score and high matriculations to Ivy schools and ranking Ignatius and Fenwick as the two best. There is a cite (Buntingandlyon.com) you can check and then you can order the report as I have which will verify if you want.

I also asked my friend if she knew anything about some of those other points that are not cited. Those check out to, and I now have info that can be cited. The school is by the archiect as listed. Go into Fenwick's Webpage and go into photos and then into "1929 booklet" and there is the first school yearbook scanned onto the site that talks about the design and building of the school and photo's of the building in 1929 as well as the architect who designed it. Then, there is a book written called "The Story of Notre Dame-100 Years", by Arthur J. Hope. Chpter 28 talks about the redesigning of Notre Dame's 1888 Sacred Heart Church by the same architect that did Fenwick. Fenwick was done in 1929 and Notre Dame's work was completed in 1931. My fiend also said that yes, the Fenwick song is inspired by one of yale's songs. The Yale song is called "Down the Field" and it is written by C.W O'Conner with music by Stanleigh P. Friedman. She also said that when girl teams are playing, they do substitute "Men of Steel" for "Teams of Steel" as was the case for the victory celebration when the girl's basketball won state. The information my friend has about the archiect and the school song came from material sourced by John Quinn the school's primary historian, Quinn went to Amhearst and also teaches at the school, he also won a golden apple teaching award while at Fenwick that awarded him a scholarship to attend Northwestern University for an advance degree in history which he also has now. John quinn is the brother of the prominant Quinn alumni listed at the bottom of Fenwick's page. That Quinn was a politician who attended Georgetown. She also said that if you go to Fenwick homepage and listen to their song and go to www.ivysport.com that also has Yale's song, they are almost identical. She also said that somewhere on the web the relevant chapter for the Notre Dame's book talking about the architect is also out there if you search the web. In short, Fenwick's page is accurate and it all checks out. I will put in the citations now- I will leave it up to you to adjust if need. Have a wonderful and safe 4th!

PLEASE NOTE: I sorry, the source is Bunting not Buntington as was previously cited. corrections were already done-thank you

ONE LAST POINT: My friend also said that there is a very important alumni missing from the list. he is actually both nobility and royality from a very ancient family. He is one of Fenwick's most illustrious alumni. He is most famous for being an aerospace engineer and car designer that designed concepts for the Bentley Continental Gt and the Ferrari Enzo. My fiend even asked the schoolabout this individual. She also said that he was class vice-president, Chairman of the Wick, and Captain of Fenwick's Track team of the discuss group.


To create an account, select Log in (top right of page) then create an account. You will need to provide a username and password as well as answer a visual 'captcha'. After you've done that, then return to this page or my Talk page and explain more fully what is going on. Thank you.

By the way, this is a minor effort and issue for me. I do consider accuracy and verifiability on WP to be very important, but fixing vandalism takes much less effort for me than it does for the vandals to create it.
Jim Dunning | talk 18:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the additional information and your help, and I hope you resolve things on your end.
Jim Dunning | talk 19:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Thank you for your interest in Fenwick High School, we welcome constructive postings and discussion about the school. Please refrain from posting any personal information about alumni and/or faculty that is inappropriate for a public forum. Thank you.Fenwick School (talk) 17:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

School colors

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Fenwick's official school colors are black and white. These are also the official colors associated with the Dominican Order. The school also uses a simplifed crest, as well, also associated with the Dominican Order. A shield halfed with a reverted V portion of black on top and white below- symbolic of the Order's use of a black cape over a white tunic. Other colors (unofficially) associated with the school are silver and grey, that sometimes show up in sport uniforms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.141.156.8 (talk) 18:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Dominican High School

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Before Fenwick became Fenwick High School in 1929, it was initially referred to as Dominican Academy and Dominican High School-partially in response to Dominican University in River Forrest. With the placement of the corner stone, it was officially called Fenwick High School in honor of Dominican Bishop Edward Fenwick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.141.156.8 (talk) 18:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Rivals

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Many schools in Chicago try to claim Fenwick as a rival of theirs. St. Patrick's wants to be a rival with Fenwick's top-ranked water polo team. Loyola Academy is always against Fenwick in Hockey, while Oak Park River Forrest H.S. wants to see Fenwick as a cross-town rival, yet OPRF's 23 ACT average in comparison to Fenwick's 27 and nationally top-ranked academic and sports teams is hardly any real indicator of true competition, neither are the other schools. Overall, the biggest rivalry with prep schools in Chicago is between Fenwick and St. Ignatius College Prep, they are both in the same league academically, and they are both competeing to enroll Chicago's best and brightest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.141.156.154 (talk) 16:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Sockpuppetry and hoaxes

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Per this sockpuppet report, and this checkuser request, several editor who have made significant edits to this page, have been confirmed as abusive sockpuppets/sockpuppeteers:

The Checkuser (see bottom of WP:RFCU link) indicates this person has a long history of adding hoax material to articles; unfortunately, they also seem to have a history of adding legitimate information as well, so their changes can't just be blindly-reverted. I do not have enough knowledge of this particular subject to be helpful, but I suggest those of you who do, and regularly maintain this page, go back and review these users' additions, remove anything they've added that can't be sourced and verified, and add citations for anything that can be sourced but is currently unreferenced, to remove any suspicion of the legitimacy of the article.

They appear to be somewhat prolific, so if a new account shows up lobbying for re-insertion of any material you folks end up deleting as unsourced, I'd suggest being a bit wary, and insisting even more strongly than perhaps we usually do on verifiable, reliable sources for everything they try to add. They tend to cite "rare" sources that they have in their possession, so I guess emphasis on "verifiable".

I'm not checking each article I tag with this information, so if you've already noticed this misbehavior and dealt with it, feel free to mark this section resolved or something. --barneca (talk) 15:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Keep the "top x in the nation" stuff to a minimum

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There were some very lofty claims being made in the extracurricular section that was not being backed up by references, most notably, the math team and scholastic bowl team being top whatever in the nation. First, if they were, it was for a certain amount of time that was never noted. Second, knowing scholastic bowl, the team was never nationally ranked by anything other than a single author's blog opinion. Third, the Wheaton North tournament, while a big tournament, did not involve Fenwick beating the University of Chicago Lab School, because Chicago Lab has no team and has never attended a scholastic bowl tournament. This tells me that sources are either unreliable, or some editors were getting inventive with writing. Given what I see above, I think it was the latter, but from what I know of journalism, It may be a combination. I think this article is well on its way to being an excellent article thanks to many editors who labored to get the sourcing. Please be sure that anything you add is rock solidly sourced, is encyclopedic, and is not of short term interest. Make your writing precise. LonelyBeacon (talk) 21:06, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


Problems with editing

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Fenwick is currently defined as a parochial school- which technically it is not. Traditionally, parochial schools are schools with a parish attached to them. Fenwick does not have such a parish. It is a private day school of Roman Catholic denomination and run independantly. The "Special Archdiocese Admission Test" is also ambiguous. I had provided more specific wording to clarify what that means. The tuition cost is also misleading- it is a base devoid of sports costs and additional fees for extra-curriculars. Attending Fenwick will ultimately be in excess of $10,000. The reverting that is taking place, is not presenting a fully accurate account- not to mention that fenwick has a 100% college acceptance rate throughout it's founding, which was stated previously and validly cited as well. There was also removal of several notewothy and justifiably placed alumni that were fully cited. The webpage source that you are using at the moment is fine, but an incomplete list. Some alumni of the school do not want their biographies to apprear to non-alumni. Alumni of the school have their own code that opens up a complete listing of all memebers- therefore you have removed alumni that deserve to be on the list.Dr.Oak (talk) 23:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nicely Constructed Article

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think the article now looks very complete, written encyclopedicly and constructed well. The placement of the images by LonlyBeacon also creates excellent visual balance.Dr.Oak (talk) 15:26, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review Suggestions

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I am copying this over so that they can be better examined and "checked off".

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
Based on article length, the lead should be about 3 paragraphs.   Done
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]  Done
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 3 meter, use 3 meter, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 3&nbsp;meter.[?]  Done
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.  Done
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honor (A) (British: honour), meter (A) (British: metre), metre (B) (American: meter), defense (A) (British: defence), recognize (A) (British: recognise), enrollment (A) (British: enrolment), enrolment (B) (American: enrollment), program (A) (British: programme).  Done
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]  Done
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 00:30, 8 August 2008 (UTC) LonelyBeacon (talk) 19:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

More Peer Review

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Very special and public thanks to User:Ruhrfisch for his time and effort in peer reviewing this article. I have already taken some steps in regards to the suggestions. Aside from more references. There needs to be more addition by subtraction. The timeline near the end needs to be excised. I have not done this, because some of that needs to be added into the history section, and I would rather an editor more knowledgeable on such matters (and thankfully, I know there are at least one or two) handle that part so that it gets worded accurately. LonelyBeacon (talk) 20:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Also thanks to User:Finetooth. I just noticed that this was a separate editor, and not just "finer" suggestions being made by Ruhrfisch. LonelyBeacon (talk) 20:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review Corrections

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Corrections made: Excised timeline, and scratched valedictorian and senior officers. Important dates were added into text with citation.Dr.Oak (talk) 00:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re-assessment

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am re-assessing this article as B / High for WikiProject Schools. The peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Fenwick High School (Oak Park, Illinois)/archive1 contains plenty of advice in improving the article. Overall, the article seems to be meet the standards for B-class and is on its way to GA. Additional hints I can give is to make sure the article uses appropriate cite templates such as {{cite web}}, expand the lead a bit more, ensure the article is fully compliant with the WP:MOS, and to investigate the copyright of the logo more as the licence's accuracy is a bit suspicious. I am giving the article high importance for its alumni, long history, notable teachers, and achievements. Camaron | Chris (talk) 16:39, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply


Alumni

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I have to disagree with some of LonelyBacon's removal of alumni. both the General and WWII flying ace deserve their own pages within Wikipedia and have good sourcing to them, outside of Fenwick. Those two, at least, deserve to be brought back with valid sourcing.Catal uber (talk) 00:36, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

There is two General Healys, one major and one brigaider, and I beleive they are father and son. Sourcing is confussing and just removed alumnus for now till better sourcing emerges- but he should be in there. I sourced the ace, Cullerton, properlyCatal uber (talk) 01:11, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to walk away from this article (again). It seems that difficulties seem to hang on it like an albatross. Proceed as you will, I will not edit war over this. LonelyBeacon (talk) 01:34, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


reversing edits

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

why do you revert an edit by saying that it it not listed in a 2009 mag, when the citation comes from a site and indicated as such. The facts are correct, cited correctly, and can be checked as we speak. So what is your issue?Fenwick HS (talk)

The sources listed is "The Magazine, 2007" and "The Magazine, 2009". That's well before the 2010 events you are trying to source. Edward321 (talk) 00:13, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

That is not the souce I used or cited. You are just trying to create an excuse to revert.It is cited correctly. If you revert again, than you are just unethical. I also don't take bait of trolling. Fenwick HS (talk) 18:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Removing legitimate points

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't really see the logic of removing a factually accurate point about the 2010-2011 standing on merit-based scholarships, nor that Fenwick was the 2011 conference chess champions, or removing a ton of notable alumni from the business section. This isn't a conflict of interest or a "prestige factor". No one is writing that Fenwick is the "greatest school". These are legitimate points, factual points. Now it did say that Fenwick achieved a "record" $40 million in merit-based scholarships- which is a record for the school- and may be confussed as a national record. That wording may be corrected. But $40 million in merit based scholarships- is simply a factual statement, and not a prestige issue in ay sort of way. Returning factual points with corrected wording.thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.7.196.150 (talk) 16:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 7 external links on Fenwick High School (Oak Park, Illinois). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 22 external links on Fenwick High School (Oak Park, Illinois). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Fenwick High School (Oak Park, Illinois). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Fenwick High School (Oak Park, Illinois). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Fenwick High School (Oak Park, Illinois). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fenwick High School (Oak Park, Illinois). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fenwick High School (Oak Park, Illinois). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

alumni again

edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I have removed a number of alumni who do not have wikipedia articles to show their notability. The edit is here is here [1] in case anyone wants to attempt to write articles for any of them. Some of them may well be notable enough to qualify for an article, but none of them appear to meet the requirements to be presumed notable without an article. Meters (talk) 05:15, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Paul E. Tierney, Jr. has been restored with the correct link. Meters (talk) 05:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fenwick_High_School_(Oak_Park,_Illinois)&oldid=1258760577"