Talk:Fertility-development controversy
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Dr. Canning's comment on this article
editDr. Canning has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
This article really covers a single paper in the field with a contentious hypothesis. The paper is almost certainly wrong - this is discussed in the critique. My view is that dictionary entries should cover broad area with a reasonably wide literature - eg is fertility rising in developed countries - this paper on the effect of the HDI on fertility is a bit strange and probably not worth its own article but if there is to be an article this one is reasonably good
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Canning has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
- Reference : Jocelyn E. Finlay & David Canning & June Y. T. Po, 2012. "Reproductive Health Laws Around the World," PGDA Working Papers 9612, Program on the Global Demography of Aging.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 07:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- I agree it was not worthy of a separate article, so I moved the referenced material to Demographic-economic_paradox#Contrary_findings. Mikael Häggström (talk) 09:15, 6 February 2016 (UTC)