Talk:Fetal surgery

note

Fact-check the reference to vesicostomy; use of a catheter implies the procedure was placement of a vesicoamniotic shunt (as in the cited newspaper story), not a vesicostomy. Also, I deleted the claim that open fetal surgery has proven safe for mother and fetus; that is far too absolute. Una Smith 04:28, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Samuel Armas Aug19 1999.jpg

The image Image:Samuel Armas Aug19 1999.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Fetal intervention

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge. PriceDL (talk) 18:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

---

This seems to be the same subject. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Support: With Fetal Intervention currently having no authority by reference at all, it shouldn't stand alone. As a layman, it could be complete nonsense, and I have no way to discern. fredgandt 20:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Reject: With Fetal Intervention Fetal intervention is not a medical topic in of itself but could be subsections under fetal surgery or fetal medicine. CranberryMuffin (talk) 19:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Support: All the interventions mentioned at Fetal intervention appear to be surgical PriceDL (talk) 17:07, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Eugene Gu

This article is about "any of a broad range of surgical techniques that are used to treat birth defects in fetuses who are still in the pregnant uterus". Eugene Gu is known for transplanting human fetal organs into animal hosts, and more general research involving human fetal material. That's not about surgical techniques used to treat birth defects in fetuses. It might conceivably have such applications later, though my impression is that Gu wants to grow those organs to treat infants or otherwise non-fetal humans, not to transplant them back into fetuses. In either case, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball that gazes into a hypothetical future, and none of the independent sources connects Gu to fetal surgery. Neither the "Research" section discussing Gu's work nor the "see also" link are relevant to the topic of this article. There's also the problem that the only scientific source about Gu's work is by Gu himself. I don't think that's the kind of independent, secondary source we should use according to WP:MEDRS. Thus I'll remove both the section and the "see also" link. Huon (talk) 19:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

H2 antagonist

It says this is given for anaesthesia the night before surgery, as well as an antacid. H2 blockers (antagonists) are antacids. Not sure if I'm misreading this bit but it doesn't seem quite right. Brionyvet (talk) 22:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)