Talk:Fhtagn nagh Yog-Sothoth
This page was proposed for deletion by LuciferMorgan (talk · contribs) on 25 July 2008 with the comment: Demo fails WP:MUSIC guidelines - demos can only be notable "if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources" It was contested by SarekOfVulcan (talk · contribs) on 2008-07-30 with the comment: Added ref to scholarly book spending 3 pages on this album |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should be kept!
editI believe this article should be kept because it is indeed a notable demo. It is one of the very first recordings of the funeral doom subgenre of music. That's one reason. Another reason is because there is a band named after one of the songs on this album. That band is Evoken. BTC 20:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fhtagn nagh Yog-Sothoth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060923122148/http://www.someplaceelse.net/shop/product_info.php?products_id=445 to http://www.someplaceelse.net/shop/product_info.php?products_id=445
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 26 January 2018 (UTC)